Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Valentio Iverson
dblp:397/6964
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
mistake bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Importance of Randomization in Discriminative Feature Feedback · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Importance of Randomization in Discriminative Feature Feedback · COLT 2026 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Differentially Private Sampling of Unbounded Gaussians · COLT 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Differentially Private Sampling of Unbounded Gaussians · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
randomized algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | On the Importance of Randomization in Discriminative Feature Feedback · COLT 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 2.6randomized algorithms · 1.0lower bounds · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the Importance of Randomization in Discriminative Feature FeedbackabstractDiscriminative Feature Feedback (DFF) (Dasgupta et al., 2018) is an interactive learning protocol in which a learner attempts to predict labels based on online feedback about previous correct labels, as well as discriminative features. Recent work (Bar Oz et al., 2025) studied DFF learning with general teacher classes and defined a dimension that characterizes the optimal mistake bound for deterministic algorithms in the realizable setting. In this work, we show that in sharp contrast to Online Learning, in DFF there can be an unbounded ratio between the optimal mistake bound of deterministic algorithms and that of randomized algorithms, even in the realizable setting. We further show that in this case, also non-realizable learning can have a mistake bound that does not depend on the dimension at all. This result relies on a new algorithmic technique that allows introducing new candidate hypotheses incrementally and could be of independent interest. We further show that in DFF, there can be a significant difference between the obtainable mistake bounds against an oblivious adversary and against an adaptive adversary, again in contrast to Online Learning. Our work shows that once richer feedback than labels is allowed, the landscape of randomized versus deterministic algorithms becomes significantly more involved, and raises new questions on characterizing the optimal mistake bound under differing randomization regimes. Valentio Iverson, Tosca Lechner, Sivan Sabato |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | Optimal Differentially Private Sampling of Unbounded GaussiansabstractWe provide the first $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(d)$-sample algorithm for sampling from unbounded Gaussian distributions under the constraint of $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy. This is a quadratic improvement over previous results for the same problem, settling an open question of Ghazi, Hu, Kumar, and Manurangsi. Valentio Iverson, Gautam Kamath 0001, Argyris Mouzakis |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | LAVCap: LLM-based Audio-Visual Captioning using Optimal TransportabstractAutomated audio captioning is a task that generates textual descriptions for audio content, and recent studies have explored using visual information to enhance captioning quality. However, current methods often fail to effectively fuse audio and visual data, missing important semantic cues from each modality. To address this, we introduce LAVCap, a large language model (LLM)-based audio-visual captioning framework that effectively integrates visual information with audio to improve audio captioning performance. LAVCap employs an optimal transport-based alignment loss to bridge the modality gap between audio and visual features, enabling more effective semantic extraction. Additionally, we propose an optimal transport attention module that enhances audio-visual fusion using an optimal transport assignment map. Combined with the optimal training strategy, experimental results demonstrate that each component of our framework is effective. LAVCap outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on the AudioCaps dataset, without relying on large datasets or post-processing. Code is available at https://github.com/NAVER-INTEL-Co-Lab/gaudi-lavcap. Kyeongha Rho, Hyeongkeun Lee, Valentio Iverson, Joon Son Chung |
ICASSP | 3 |