Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marvin Rübenacke
dblp:397/7911
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9055-619XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
iterative decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › channel decoding
joint detection and decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › LDPC codes
tanner graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network Approach · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sum-product algorithm · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7factor graph · 1.7end-to-end learning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Serial Polar Automorphism Ensemble Decoders for Physical Unclonable FunctionsabstractPhysical unclonable functions (PUFs) involve challenging practical applications of error-correcting codes (ECCs), requiring extremely low failure rates on the order of $10^{-6}$ and below despite raw input bit error rates as high as 22%. These requirements call for an efficient ultra-low rate code design. In this work, we propose a novel coding scheme tailored for PUFs based on Polar codes and a low-complexity version of automorphism ensemble decoding (AED). Notably, our serial AED scheme reuses a single successive cancellation (SC) decoder across multiple decoding attempts. By introducing cascaded and recursive interleavers, we efficiently scale the number of AED candidates without requiring expensive large multiplexers. An aggressive quantization strategy of only 3 bits per message further reduces the area requirements of the underlying SC decoder. The resulting coding scheme achieves the same block error rate of $10^{-6}$ as our baseline based on Bose-Ray-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (BCH) codes while requiring 1.75x fewer codeword bits to encode the same K = 312 payload bits. This reduction translates directly into 1.75x less helper data storage and, consequently, a smaller overall chip area. Marvin Rübenacke, Sebastian Cammerer, Michael Sullivan, Alexander Keller 0001 |
ICC | 1 |
| 2025 | Nested Symmetric Polar CodesabstractIn this paper, we propose a data-driven algorithm to design rate- and length-flexible polar codes. While the algorithm is very general, a particularly appealing use case is the design of codes for automorphism ensemble decoding (AED), a promising decoding algorithm for ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC) and massive machine-type communications (mMTC) applications. To this end, theoretic results on nesting of symmetric polar codes are derived, which give hope in finding a fully nested, rate-compatible sequence suitable for AED. Using the proposed algorithms, such a flexible polar code design for automorphism ensemble successive cancellation (SC) decoding is constructed, outperforming existing code designs for AED and also the 5G polar code under cyclic redundancy check (CRC)aided successive cancellation list (SCL) decoding. Marvin Rübenacke, Andreas Zunker, Felix Krieg, Stephan ten Brink |
ICC | 1 |
| 2025 | Bounds for Joint Detection and Decoding on the Binary-Input AWGN ChannelabstractFor asynchronous transmission of short blocks, preambles for packet detection contribute a non-negligible overhead. To reduce the required preamble length, joint detection and decoding (JDD) techniques have been proposed that additionally utilize the payload part of the packet for detection. In this paper, we analyze two instances of JDD, namely hybrid preamble and energy detection (HyPED) and decoder-aided detection (DAD). While HyPED combines the preamble with energy detection for the payload, DAD also uses the output of a channel decoder. For these systems, we propose novel achievability and converse bounds for the rates over the binary-input additive white Gaussian noise (BI-AWGN) channel. Moreover, we derive a general bound on the required blocklength for JDD. Both the theoretical bound and the simulation of practical codebooks show that the rate of DAD quickly approaches that of synchronous transmission. Simon Obermüller, Jannis Clausius, Marvin Rübenacke, Stephan ten Brink |
WCNC | 3 |
| 2025 | Joint Detection and Decoding: A Graph Neural Network ApproachabstractNarrowing the performance gap between optimal and feasible detection in inter-symbol interference (ISI) channels, this paper proposes to use graph neural networks (GNNs) for detection that can also be used to perform joint detection and decoding (JDD). For detection, the GNN is build upon the factor graph representations of the channel, while for JDD, the factor graph is expanded by the Tanner graph of the parity-check matrix (PCM) of the channel code, sharing the variable nodes (VNs). A particularly advantageous property of the GNN is a) the robustness against cycles in the factor graphs which is the main problem for sum-product algorithm (SPA)-based detection, and b) the robustness against channel state information (CSI) uncertainty at the receiver. Consequently, a fully deep learning-based receiver enables joint optimization instead of individual optimization of the components, so-called end-to-end learning. Furthermore, we propose a parallel flooding schedule that also reduces the latency, which turns out to improve the error correcting performance. The proposed approach is analyzed and compared to state-of-the-art baselines for different modulations and codes in terms of error correcting capability and latency. The gain compared to SPA-based detection might be explained with improved messages between nodes and adaptive damping of messages. For a higher order modulation in a high-rate turbo detection and decoding (TDD) scenario the GNN shows a, at first glance, surprisingly high gain of 6.25 dB compared to the best, feasible non-neural baseline. Jannis Clausius, Marvin Rübenacke, Daniel Tandler, Stephan ten Brink |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |