Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Zilken

dblp:397/8189 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-7221-2554ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification › probabilistic verification
probabilistic program verification
1.012026
Verifying Sampling Algorithms via Distributional Invariants · FM (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inductive invariants · 1.0hoare logic · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Verifying Sampling Algorithms via Distributional Invariants
abstract
Abstract This paper presents a Hoare-like verification framework for discrete probabilistic programs that we apply to two non-trivial sampling algorithms: Lumbroso’s Fast Dice Roller and Saad et al.’s Fast Loaded Dice Roller . These algorithms have previously resisted formal verification due to their probabilistic nature, intricate loop structure, and parametric input. Our approach complements existing proof rules based on inductive distributional invariants, enabling us to verify both total and partial correctness of the two algorithms.
Daniel Zilken, Kevin Batz, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Tobias Winkler 0001
FM (1)1
2025 Fixed Point Certificates for Reachability and Expected Rewards in MDPs
abstract
Abstract The possibility of errors in human-engineered formal verification software, such as model checkers, poses a serious threat to the purpose of these tools. An established approach to mitigate this problem are certificates —lightweight, easy-to-check proofs of the verification results. In this paper, we develop novel certificates for model checking of Markov decision processes (MDPs) with quantitative reachability and expected reward properties. Our approach is conceptually simple and relies almost exclusively on elementary fixed point theory. Our certificates work for arbitrary finite MDPs and can be readily computed with little overhead using standard algorithms. We formalize the soundness of our certificates in and provide a formally verified certificate checker . Moreover, we augment existing algorithms in the probabilistic model checker with the ability to produce certificates and demonstrate practical applicability by conducting the first formal certification of the reference results in the Quantitative Verification Benchmark Set.
Krishnendu Chatterjee, Tim Quatmann, Maximilian Schäffeler, Maximilian Weininger, Tobias Winkler 0001, Daniel Zilken
TACAS (2)6