Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rishabh Mediratta

dblp:397/9450 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
frame identification
0.912025
Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
frame-semantic parsing
0.912025
Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.912025
Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments?
abstract
Frame-semantic parsing is a critical task in natural language understanding, yet the ability of large language models (LLMs) to extract frame-semantic arguments remains underexplored.This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs on frame-semantic argument identification, analyzing the impact of input representation formats, model architectures, and generalization to unseen and out-ofdomain samples.Our experiments, spanning models from 0.5B to 72B parameters, reveal that JSON-based representations significantly enhance performance, and while larger models generally perform better, smaller models can achieve competitive results through fine-tuning.We also introduce a novel approach to frame identification leveraging predicted frame elements, achieving state-of-the-art performance on ambiguous targets.Despite strong generalization capabilities, our analysis finds that LLMs still struggle with out-of-domain data.
Jacob Daniel Devasier, Rishabh Mediratta, Chengkai Li 0001
EMNLP2