Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishabh Mediratta
dblp:397/9450
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic role labeling
frame identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
frame-semantic parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments? · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Can LLMs Extract Frame-Semantic Arguments?abstractFrame-semantic parsing is a critical task in natural language understanding, yet the ability of large language models (LLMs) to extract frame-semantic arguments remains underexplored.This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs on frame-semantic argument identification, analyzing the impact of input representation formats, model architectures, and generalization to unseen and out-ofdomain samples.Our experiments, spanning models from 0.5B to 72B parameters, reveal that JSON-based representations significantly enhance performance, and while larger models generally perform better, smaller models can achieve competitive results through fine-tuning.We also introduce a novel approach to frame identification leveraging predicted frame elements, achieving state-of-the-art performance on ambiguous targets.Despite strong generalization capabilities, our analysis finds that LLMs still struggle with out-of-domain data. Jacob Daniel Devasier, Rishabh Mediratta, Chengkai Li 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |