Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hao-Zhe Tan

dblp:398/0528 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 21% Learning theory · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model
0.912025
CGI: Identifying Conditional Generative Models with Example Images · IJCAI 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › system identification › robot dynamics identification
model identification
0.912025
CGI: Identifying Conditional Generative Models with Example Images · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model reuse
0.912025
Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
model search
0.912025
CGI: Identifying Conditional Generative Models with Example Images · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.912025
Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model selection
0.912025
Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt-based model identification · 0.9model labeling · 0.9ensemble · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation
abstract
Pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are becoming increasingly popular across various visual tasks, and several open-sourced VLM variants have been released. However, selecting the best-performing pre-trained VLM for a specific downstream task is challenging since no single VLM can achieve promising performance on all downstream tasks, and evaluating all available VLMs is impossible due to time and data limitations. To address this problem, this paper proposes a novel paradigm to select and reuse VLM for downstream tasks, called **M**odel **L**abel **L**earning (**MLL**). The proposal contains three key modules: *model labeling*, which assigns labels to each VLM to describe their specialty and utility; *model selection*, which matches the requirements of the target task with model labels; and *model reuse*, which applies selected VLMs to the target task in an ensemble manner. The proposal is highly computationally efficient and growable since the model labeling process is completed target task independent and the ability could grow with the number of candidate VLMs. We also introduce a new benchmark for evaluating VLM selection methods, including 49 VLMs and 17 target task datasets. Experimental results clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for selecting and reusing VLMs.
Hao-Zhe Tan, Zhi Zhou 0007, Yufeng Li 0008, Lan-Zhe Guo
ICML1
2025 CGI: Identifying Conditional Generative Models with Example Images
abstract
Generative models have achieved remarkable performance recently, and thus model hubs have emerged. Existing model hubs typically assume basic text matching is sufficient to search for models. However, in reality, due to different abstractions and the large number of models in model hubs, it is not easy for users to review model descriptions and example images, choosing which model best meets their needs. Therefore, it is necessary to describe model functionality wisely so that future users can efficiently search for the most suitable model for their needs. Efforts to address this issue remain limited. In this paper, we propose Conditional Generative Model Identification (CGI), which aims to provide an effective way to identify the most suitable model using user-provided example images rather than requiring users to manually review a large number of models with example images. To address this problem, we propose the Prompt-Based Model Identification (PMI), which can adequately describe model functionality and precisely match requirements with specifications. To evaluate PMI approach and promote related research, we provide a benchmark comprising 65 models and 9100 identification tasks. Extensive experimental and human evaluation results demonstrate that PMI is effective. For instance, 92% of models are correctly identified with significantly better FID scores when four example images are provided.
Zhi Zhou 0007, Hao-Zhe Tan, Peng-Xiao Song, Lan-Zhe Guo
IJCAI2