Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhifei Ren
dblp:398/2371
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video understanding evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative VideosabstractWe present VRBench, the first long narrative video benchmark crafted for evaluating large models' multi-step reasoning capabilities, addressing limitations in existing evaluations that overlook temporal reasoning and procedural validity. It comprises 960 long videos (with an average duration of 1.6 hours), along with 8,243 human-labeled multi-step question-answering pairs and 25,106 reasoning steps with timestamps. These videos are curated via a multi-stage filtering process including expert inter-rater reviewing to prioritize plot coherence. We develop a human-AI collaborative framework that generates coherent reasoning chains, each requiring multiple temporally grounded steps, spanning seven types (e.g., event attribution, implicit inference). VRBench designs a multi-phase evaluation pipeline that assesses models at both the outcome and process levels. Apart from the MCQs for the final results, we propose a progress-level LLM-guided scoring metric to evaluate the quality of the reasoning chain from multiple dimensions comprehensively. Through extensive evaluations of 12 LLMs and 19 VLMs on VRBench, we undertake a thorough analysis and provide valuable insights that advance the field of multi-step reasoning. Jiashuo Yu, Yue Wu 0013, Meng Chu, Zhifei Ren, Zizheng Huang, Pei Chu, Yinan He, Zhenxiang Li, Zhongying Tu, Conghui He, Yu Qiao 0001, Yali Wang 0001, Yi Wang 0074, Limin Wang 0002 |
ICCV | 4 |