Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhifei Ren

dblp:398/2371 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering
0.912025
VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video understanding evaluation
0.912025
VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 0.9large language model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos
abstract
We present VRBench, the first long narrative video benchmark crafted for evaluating large models' multi-step reasoning capabilities, addressing limitations in existing evaluations that overlook temporal reasoning and procedural validity. It comprises 960 long videos (with an average duration of 1.6 hours), along with 8,243 human-labeled multi-step question-answering pairs and 25,106 reasoning steps with timestamps. These videos are curated via a multi-stage filtering process including expert inter-rater reviewing to prioritize plot coherence. We develop a human-AI collaborative framework that generates coherent reasoning chains, each requiring multiple temporally grounded steps, spanning seven types (e.g., event attribution, implicit inference). VRBench designs a multi-phase evaluation pipeline that assesses models at both the outcome and process levels. Apart from the MCQs for the final results, we propose a progress-level LLM-guided scoring metric to evaluate the quality of the reasoning chain from multiple dimensions comprehensively. Through extensive evaluations of 12 LLMs and 19 VLMs on VRBench, we undertake a thorough analysis and provide valuable insights that advance the field of multi-step reasoning.
Jiashuo Yu, Yue Wu 0013, Meng Chu, Zhifei Ren, Zizheng Huang, Pei Chu, Yinan He, Zhenxiang Li, Zhongying Tu, Conghui He, Yu Qiao 0001, Yali Wang 0001, Yi Wang 0074, Limin Wang 0002
ICCV4