Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Derevyagin

dblp:398/2891 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 91% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
1.012026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
latent action learning
1.012026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
in-context reinforcement learning
0.912025
Vintix: Action Model via In-Context Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
object-centric representation learning
0.312026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised object-centric pretraining · 1.0latent action policy optimization · 1.0expert distillation · 0.9algorithm distillation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Object-Centric Latent Action Learning
abstract
Leveraging vast amounts of unlabeled internet video data for embodied AI is currently bottlenecked by the lack of action labels and the presence of action-correlated visual distractors. Although recent latent action policy optimization (LAPO) has shown promise in inferring proxy action labels from visual observations, its performance degrades significantly when distractors are present. To address this limitation, we propose a novel object-centric latent action learning framework that centers on objects rather than pixels. We leverage self-supervised object-centric pretraining to disentangle the movement of the agent and distracting background dynamics. This allows LAPO to focus on task-relevant interactions, resulting in more robust proxy-action labels, enabling better imitation learning and efficient adaptation of the agent with just a few action-labeled trajectories. We evaluated our method in eight visually complex tasks across the Distracting Control Suite (DCS) and Distracting MetaWorld (DMW). Our results show that object-centric pretraining mitigates the negative effects of distractors by 50%, as measured by downstream task performance: average return (DCS) and success rate (DMW).
Albina Klepach, Alexander Nikulin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Alexander Derevyagin, Andrei Polubarov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Igor Kiselev, Vladislav Kurenkov
AAAI5
2025 Vintix: Action Model via In-Context Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In-Context Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) represents a promising paradigm for developing generalist agents that learn at inference time through trial-and-error interactions, analogous to how large language models adapt contextually, but with a focus on reward maximization. However, the scalability of ICRL beyond toy tasks and single-domain settings remains an open challenge. In this work, we present the first steps toward scaling ICRL by introducing a fixed, cross-domain model capable of learning behaviors through in-context reinforcement learning. Our results demonstrate that Algorithm Distillation, a framework designed to facilitate ICRL, offers a compelling and competitive alternative to expert distillation to construct versatile action models. These findings highlight the potential of ICRL as a scalable approach for generalist decision-making systems.
Andrei Polubarov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Alexander Derevyagin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Alexander Nikulin, Vladislav Kurenkov
ICML3