Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clement Svendsen
dblp:398/4851
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-9367-1303ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning · STOC 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
replicable learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning · STOC 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning · STOC 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral graph theory · 1.0random walk analysis · 1.0cayley graph · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC LearningabstractIn this paper, we consider the problem of replicable realizable PAC learning. We construct a particularly hard learning problem and show a sample complexity lower bound with a close to (log|H|)3/2 dependence on the size of the hypothesis class H. Our proof uses several novel techniques and works by defining a particular Cayley graph associated with H and analyzing a suitable random walk on this graph by examining the spectral properties of its adjacency matrix. Furthermore, we show an almost matching upper bound for the lower bound instance, meaning if a stronger lower bound exists, one would have to consider a different instance of the problem. Kasper Green Larsen, Markus Engelund Mathiasen, Chirag Pabbaraju, Clement Svendsen |
STOC | 4 |