EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pegah Golchian
dblp:398/6470
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Generative modeling · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical testing · 0.9generative modeling · 0.9adversarial random forests · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Conditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random ForestsabstractThis paper proposes a method for measuring conditional feature importance via generative modeling. In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), conditional feature importance assesses the impact of a feature on a prediction model's performance given the information of other features. Model-agnostic post hoc methods to do so typically evaluate changes in the predictive performance under on-manifold feature value manipulations. Such procedures require creating feature values that respect conditional feature distributions, which can be challenging in practice. Recent advancements in generative modeling can facilitate this. For tabular data, which may consist of both categorical and continuous features, the adversarial random forest (ARF) stands out as a generative model that can generate on-manifold data points without requiring intensive tuning efforts or computational resources, making it a promising candidate model for subroutines in XAI methods. This paper proposes cARFi (conditional ARF feature importance), a method for measuring conditional feature importance through feature values sampled from ARF-estimated conditional distributions. cARFi requires only little tuning to yield robust importance scores that can flexibly adapt for conditional or marginal notions of feature importance, including straightforward extensions to condition on feature subsets and allows for inferring the significance of feature importances through statistical tests. Kristin Blesch, Niklas Koenen, Jan Kapar, Pegah Golchian, Lukas Burk, Markus Loecher, Marvin N. Wright |
AAAI | 4 |