Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zemei Liu

dblp:398/7522 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 77% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
vector commitment
0.912025
NTTproofs: A Maintainable and Aggregatable Vector Commitment With Fast Openings and Updates · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sharding · 0.9number theoretic transform · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 NTTproofs: A Maintainable and Aggregatable Vector Commitment With Fast Openings and Updates
abstract
In vector commitments, the complex process of generating and updating proofs, along with the large-sized proofs, seriously hinders the practicality of stateless cryptocurrencies. In this work, we present NTTproofs, containing two sub-schemes, a vector commitment (VC) and a mulit-vector commitment (MC). Both sub-schemes are maintainable and aggregatable, and they also enjoy fast openings (i.e., generating all the proofs) as well as efficient proof updates. MC in NTTproofs employs the Fast Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) and sharding technique to significantly improve the time of generating all proofs by up to$0.76 \times $and$0.32 \times $, respectively, over Balanceproofs, Matproofs. Moreover, our proposed MC in NTTproofs is efficiently maintainable and requires merely 15.78 milliseconds at$n_{1}=n_{2}=2^{12}$to update all proofs. Meanwhile, NTTproofs schemes exhibit superior aggregatability, taking 0.003 seconds in VC and 0.05 seconds in MC to aggregate 1024 proofs and reducing the size of an aggregated proof to a constant size of 96 Bytes. Finally, macrobenchmarks indicate that our proposed MC in NTTproofs outperforms the other schemes, but is slightly inferior to that of Balanceproofs.
Lijuan Huo, Enshu Wang, Jinfei Liu, Chunshuo Li, Zemei Liu
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.6