Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jed Guzelkabaagac
dblp:399/2326
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy amplification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured subsampling · 1.7self-supervised training · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series ForecastingabstractMany forms of sensitive data, such as web traffic, mobility data, or hospital occupancy, are inherently sequential. The standard method for training machine learning models while ensuring privacy for units of sensitive information, such as individual hospital visits, is differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD). However, we observe in this work that the formal guarantees of DP-SGD are incompatible with time series specific tasks like forecasting, since they rely on the *privacy amplification* attained by training on small, unstructured batches sampled from an unstructured dataset. In contrast, batches for forecasting are generated by (1) sampling sequentially structured time series from a dataset, (2) sampling contiguous subsequences from these series, and (3) partitioning them into context and ground-truth forecast windows. We theoretically analyze the privacy amplification attained by this *structured subsampling* to enable the training of forecasting models with sound and tight event- and user-level privacy guarantees. Towards more private models, we additionally prove how data augmentation amplifies privacy in self-supervised training of sequence models. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that amplification by structured subsampling enables the training of forecasting models with strong formal privacy guarantees. Jan Schuchardt, Mina Dalirrooyfard, Jed Guzelkabaagac, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 3 |