Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

An Zhong

dblp:399/3644 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-4806-0586ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 46% Performance modeling and evaluation · 24% Integrated circuit design · 15%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
architectural simulation
0.912025
Assassyn: A Unified Abstraction for Architectural Simulation and Implementation · ISCA 2025
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error resilience
0.912025
GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection
0.912025
GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU microarchitecture
0.912025
GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Integrated circuit design › digital system design
register-transfer level design
0.912025
Assassyn: A Unified Abstraction for Architectural Simulation and Implementation · ISCA 2025
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.912025
GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
simulation-based evaluation
0.312025
GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › simulation-based evaluation
simulation-based performance modeling
0.312025
Assassyn: A Unified Abstraction for Architectural Simulation and Implementation · ISCA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical fault injection · 0.9machine learning · 0.9asynchronous event handling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Assassyn: A Unified Abstraction for Architectural Simulation and Implementation
abstract
The continuous growth of on-chip transistors driven by technology scaling urges architecture developers to design and implement novel architectures to effectively utilize the excessive on-chip resources.Due to the challenges of programming in register-transfer level (RTL) languages, performance modeling based on simulation is typically developed alongside hardware implementation, allowing the exploration of high-level design decisions before dealing with the error-prone, low-level RTL details.However, this approach also introduces new challenges in coordinating across multiple teams to align implementation details separate codebases.In this paper, we address this issue by presenting Assassyn, a unified, high-level, and general-purpose programming framework for architectural simulation and implementation.By taking advantage of the concept of asynchronous event handling, a widely existing behavior in both hardware design and implementation and software engineering, a general-purpose, and high-level programming abstraction is proposed to mitigate the difficulties of RTL programming.Moreover, the unified programming interface naturally enables an accurate and faithful alignment between the simulation-based performance modeling and RTL implementation.Our evaluation demonstrates that Assassyn's high-level programming interface is sufficiently expressive to implement a wide range * Serve as both the first and correspondence author.
Jian Weng 0002, Boyang Han, Derui Gao, Ruijie Gao, Wanning Zhang, An Zhong, Ceyu Xu, Jihao Xin, Yangzhixin Luo, Lisa Wu Wills, Marco Canini
ISCA6
2025 CCMnet: A cluster-level contrastive cross-domain framework for GIS insulation defects diagnosis
Bin Gou, Jigang Wang, An Zhong, Baisen Lin, Weiwen Chen, Congzhen Xie
Knowl. Based Syst.6
2025 GEREM: Fast and Precise Error Resilience Assessment for GPU Microarchitectures
abstract
GPUs are widely used hardware acceleration platforms in many areas due to their great computational throughput. In the meanwhile, GPUs are vulnerable to transient hardware faults in the post-Moore era. Analyzing the error resilience of GPUs are critical for both hardware and software. Statistical fault injection approaches are commonly used for error resilience analysis, which are highly accurate but very time consuming. In this work, we propose GEREM, a first framework to speed up fault injection process so as to estimate the error resilience of GPU microarchitectures swiftly and precisely. We find early fault behaviors can be used to accurately predict the final outcomes of program execution. Based on this observation, we categorize the early behaviors of hardware faults into GPU Early Fault Manifestation models (EFMs). For data structures, EFMs are early propagation characteristics of faults, while for pipeline instructions, EFMs are heuristic properties of several instruction contexts. We further observe that EFMs are determined by static microarchitecture states, so we can capture them without actually simulating the program execution process under fault injections. Leveraging these observations, our GEREM framework first profiles the microarchitectural states related for EFMs at one time. It then injects faults into the profiled traces to immediately generate EFMs. For data storage structures, EFMs are directly used to predict final fault outcomes, while for pipeline instructions, machine learning is used for prediction. Evaluation results show GEREM precisely assesses the error resilience of GPU microarchitecture structures with$237\times$speedup on average comparing with traditional fault injections.
Jingweijia Tan, An Zhong, Kaige Yan, Xiaohui Wei 0002, Guanpeng Li
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3