Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jianxing Lin
dblp:399/5270
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Spatial and temporal data management · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial crowdsourcing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Multi-Center Collaboration for Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing · ICDE 2025 |
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial crowdsourcing
task assignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Multi-Center Collaboration for Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing · ICDE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative optimization · 1.7game theory · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimizing Multi-Center Collaboration for Task Assignment in Spatial CrowdsourcingabstractThe rapid development of smart devices has fostered the growth of Spatial Crowdsourcing (SC), where workers complete spatial tasks by traveling to specific locations. Task assignment is a key issue in SC due to the inherent complexity of matching workers with these spatial tasks efficiently. Previous studies on task assignment have primarily focused on optimizing worker-task matching within a single, centralized area, often ignoring scenarios that involve multiple independent service centers across an area. To address this gap, we introduce a collaborative multi-center task assignment problem, which focuses on scenarios where an SC platform manages multiple independent service centers within an area, shifting the focus from worker-level cooperation to exploring the solutions specific to multi-center coordination. We target the imbalances between available workers and unassigned tasks among different centers, aiming to maximize the total number of assigned tasks and minimize unfairness in inter-center collaboration. In particular, we propose an Iterative Multi-center Task Assignment and Optimization (IMTAO) framework. IMTAO operates in two phases: (1) center-independent task assignment based on an efficient sequential task assignment algorithm, and (2) inter-center workforce transfer based on a game-theoretic multi-center collaboration algorithm that ensures fair collaboration through bi-directional optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of IMTAO in enhancing task assignment and improving collaboration fairness compared to baseline methods. Ximu Zeng, Jianxing Lin, Liwei Deng 0001, Yuchen Fang 0001, Yan Zhao 0008, Kai Zheng 0001 |
ICDE | 2 |