Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leong Su Yean
dblp:399/7100
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
agent planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent planning
collaborative planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
react · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM AgentsabstractEffective asynchronous planning, or the ability to efficiently reason and plan over states and actions that must happen in parallel or sequentially, is essential for agents that must account for time delays, reason over diverse long-horizon tasks, and collaborate with other agents. While large language model (LLM) agents show promise in high-level task planning, current benchmarks focus primarily on short-horizon tasks and do not evaluate such asynchronous planning capabilities. We introduce Robotouille, a challenging benchmark environment designed to test LLM agents' ability to handle long-horizon asynchronous scenarios. Our synchronous and asynchronous datasets capture increasingly complex planning challenges that go beyond existing benchmarks, requiring agents to manage over-
lapping tasks and interruptions Our results show that ReAct (gpt-4o) achieves 47% on synchronous tasks but only 11% on asynchronous tasks, highlighting significant room for improvement. We further analyze failure modes, demonstrating the need for LLM agents to better incorporate long-horizon feedback and self-audit their reasoning during task execution. Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Leong Su Yean, Neha Sunkara, Sanjiban Choudhury |
ICLR | 2 |