Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Changmin Kang

dblp:399/7174 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Efficient and distributed learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data pruning
0.912025
Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
example difficulty
0.912025
Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
predictive uncertainty
0.912025
Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

difficulty scoring · 0.9beta distribution sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lightweight Dataset Pruning without Full Training via Example Difficulty and Prediction Uncertainty
abstract
Recent advances in deep learning rely heavily on massive datasets, leading to substantial storage and training costs. Dataset pruning aims to alleviate this demand by discarding redundant examples. However, many existing methods require training a model with a full dataset over a large number of epochs before being able to prune the dataset, which ironically makes the pruning process more expensive than just training the model on the entire dataset. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Difficulty and Uncertainty-Aware Lightweight (DUAL) score, which aims to identify important samples from the early training stage by considering both example difficulty and prediction uncertainty. To address a catastrophic accuracy drop at an extreme pruning ratio, we further propose a pruning ratio-adaptive sampling using Beta distribution. Experiments on various datasets and learning scenarios such as image classification with label noise and image corruption, and model architecture generalization demonstrate the superiority of our method over previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches. Specifically, on ImageNet-1k, our method reduces the time cost for pruning to 66% compared to previous methods while achieving a SOTA 60% test accuracy at a 90% pruning ratio. On CIFAR datasets, the time cost is reduced to just 15% while maintaining SOTA performance.
Yeseul Cho, Baekrok Shin, Changmin Kang, Chulhee Yun
ICML3