EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingzhu Chen
dblp:399/7191
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Human-AI interaction · 41% Learning and educational technologies · 36% User interface design and tools · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
AI-assisted writing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AI Personalization Paradox: Reading Highlights for Personalized AI-Assisted Writing Increases Engagement but Undermines Autonomy and Ownership · CHI 2026 |
Human-AI interaction
AI-mediated communication |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ChatLearn: Leveraging Non-Native Speaker Communication Challenges as Language Learning Opportunities · CHI 2026 |
Learning and educational technologies › language learning
computer-assisted language learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ChatLearn: Leveraging Non-Native Speaker Communication Challenges as Language Learning Opportunities · CHI 2026 |
Learning and educational technologies › language learning
language learning support |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ChatLearn: Leveraging Non-Native Speaker Communication Challenges as Language Learning Opportunities · CHI 2026 |
User interface design and tools
personalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AI Personalization Paradox: Reading Highlights for Personalized AI-Assisted Writing Increases Engagement but Undermines Autonomy and Ownership · CHI 2026 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization generation
automated visualization generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GistVis: Automatic Generation of Word-scale Visualizations from Data-rich Documents · CHI 2025 |
Visualization and visual analytics › text visualization
word-scale visualization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GistVis: Automatic Generation of Word-scale Visualizations from Data-rich Documents · CHI 2025 |
Human-AI interaction
reliance on AI |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | AI Personalization Paradox: Reading Highlights for Personalized AI-Assisted Writing Increases Engagement but Undermines Autonomy and Ownership · CHI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7ablation study · 1.7spaced repetition · 1.0mixed-methods study · 1.0between-subjects study · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ChatLearn: Leveraging Non-Native Speaker Communication Challenges as Language Learning OpportunitiesabstractNon-native speakers (NNSs) face significant language barriers in multilingual communication with native speakers (NSs). While AI-mediated communication (AIMC) tools offer efficient one-time assistance, they often overlook opportunities for NNSs’ continuous language acquisition. We introduce ChatLearn, an enhanced AIMC system that leverages NNSs’ communication difficulties as learning opportunities. Beyond comprehension and expression assistance, ChatLearn simultaneously captures NNSs’ language challenges, and subsequently provides them with spaced review as the conversation progresses. We conducted a mixed-methods study using a communication task with 43 NNS-NS pairs, after which ChatLearn NNSs recalled significantly more expressions than the baseline group, while there was no substantial decline in communication experience. Our findings highlight the value of contextual learning in NNS-NS communication, providing a new direction for AIMC systems that foster both immediate collaboration and continuous language development. Peinuan Qin, Yugin Tan, Jingzhu Chen, Nattapat Boonprakong, Zicheng Zhu, Naomi Yamashita, Yi-Chieh Lee |
CHI | 3 |
| 2026 | AI Personalization Paradox: Reading Highlights for Personalized AI-Assisted Writing Increases Engagement but Undermines Autonomy and OwnershipabstractAI-assisted writing raises concerns about autonomy and ownership when benefiting writers. Personalization has been proposed as an effective solution while also risking writers’ reliance on AI and behavior shifting. For better personalization design, existing studies rely on interaction and information solely within the writing phase; however, few studies have examined how reading behaviors can inform personalized writing. This study investigates the effects of integrating reading highlights for personalization on AI-assisted writing. A between-subjects study with 46 participants revealed that the personalization condition encouraged participants to produce more highlights. However, highlighting unexpectedly shifted from a sense-making strategy to an instrumental act of "feeding the AI," leading to significant reliance on AI and declines in writers’ sense of autonomy, ownership, and self-credit. These findings indicate personalization risks in AI-assisted writing, emphasize the importance of personalization strategies, and provide design implications. Peinuan Qin, Chi-Lan Yang, Nattapat Boonprakong, Jingzhu Chen, Yugin Tan, Yi-Chieh Lee |
CHI | 4 |
| 2025 | GistVis: Automatic Generation of Word-scale Visualizations from Data-rich DocumentsabstractData-rich documents are ubiquitous in various applications, yet they often rely solely on textual descriptions to convey data insights. Prior research primarily focused on providing visualization-centric augmentation to data-rich documents. However, few have explored using automatically generated word-scale visualizations to enhance the document-centric reading process. As an exploratory step, we propose GistVis, an automatic pipeline that extracts and visualizes data insight from text descriptions. GistVis decomposes the generation process into four modules: Discoverer, Annotator, Extractor, and Visualizer, with the first three modules utilizing the capabilities of large language models and the fourth using visualization design knowledge. Technical evaluation including a comparative study on Discoverer and an ablation study on Annotator reveals decent performance of GistVis. Meanwhile, the user study (N=12) showed that GistVis could generate satisfactory word-scale visualizations, indicating its effectiveness in facilitating users' understanding of data-rich documents (+5.6% accuracy) while significantly reducing their mental demand (p=0.016) and perceived effort (p=0.033). Ruishi Zou, Yinqi Tang, Jingzhu Chen, Yingfan Yang, Chen Ye 0002 |
CHI | 3 |