EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luyang Niu
dblp:399/7524
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 61% Multi-agent systems · 30% Language models and text generation · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
inference cost optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
resource allocation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernet · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supernet · 0.9probabilistic sampling · 0.9neural architecture search · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic SupernetabstractLarge Language Model (LLM)-empowered multi-agent systems extend the cognitive boundaries of individual agents through disciplined collaboration and interaction, while constructing these systems often requires labor-intensive manual designs. Despite the availability of methods to automate the design of agentic workflows, they typically seek to identify a static, complex, one-size-fits-all system, which, however, fails to dynamically allocate inference resources based on the difficulty and domain of each query. To address this challenge, we shift away from the pursuit of a monolithic agentic system, instead optimizing the \textbf{agentic supernet}, a probabilistic and continuous distribution of agentic architectures. We introduce \textbf{MaAS}, an automated framework that samples query-dependent agentic systems from the supernet, delivering high-quality solutions and tailored resource allocation (\textit{e.g.}, LLM calls, tool calls, token cost). Comprehensive evaluation across six benchmarks demonstrates that MaAS \textbf{(I)} requires only $6\\sim45\\%$ of the inference costs of existing handcrafted or automated multi-agent systems, \textbf{(II)} surpasses them by $0.54\\%\sim11.82\\%$, and \textbf{(III)} enjoys superior cross-dataset and cross-LLM-backbone transferability. Guibin Zhang, Luyang Niu, Junfeng Fang, Kun Wang 0056, Lei Bai 0001, Xiang Wang 0010 |
ICML | 2 |