Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taehee Park

dblp:399/9063 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction
0.912025
Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrection · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised fine-tuning · 0.9post-correction · 0.9large language model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrection
abstract
Robust supervised fine-tuned small Language Models (sLMs) often show high reliability but tend to undercorrect.They achieve high precision at the cost of low recall.Conversely, Large Language Models (LLMs) often show the opposite tendency, making excessive overcorrection, leading to low precision.To effectively harness the strengths of LLMs to address the recall challenges in sLMs, we propose Post-Correction via Overcorrection (PoCO), a novel approach that strategically balances recall and precision.PoCO first intentionally triggers overcorrection via LLM to maximize recall by allowing comprehensive revisions, then applies a targeted post-correction step via fine-tuning smaller models to identify and refine erroneous outputs.We aim to harmonize both aspects by leveraging the generative power of LLMs while preserving the reliability of smaller supervised models.Our extensive experiments demonstrate that PoCO effectively balances GEC performance by increasing recall with competitive precision, ultimately improving the overall quality of grammatical error correction.
Taehee Park, Heejin Do, Gary Geunbae Lee
EMNLP1