Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yoav Katz
dblp:40/21
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Language models and text generation · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Electronic design automation · 95% Embedded and real-time systems · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 74% Data mining · 26% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Masked by Consensus: Disentangling Privileged Knowledge in LLM Correctness · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
base model selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | YASO: A Targeted Sentiment Analysis Evaluation Dataset for Open-Domain Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
targeted sentiment analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | YASO: A Targeted Sentiment Analysis Evaluation Dataset for Open-Domain Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
BERT |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning and data management
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Masked by Consensus: Disentangling Privileged Knowledge in LLM Correctness · ACL (1) 2026 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011 Intelligent Interleaving of Scenarios: A Novel Approach to System Level Test Generation · DAC 2007 Constraint-Based Random Stimuli Generation for Hardware Verification · AAAI 2006 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023 |
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
review mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | YASO: A Targeted Sentiment Analysis Evaluation Dataset for Open-Domain Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batching · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2009 Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batching · SODA 2002 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011 |
Electronic design automation › hardware test
test stimulus generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation quality · DAC 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | From Surrogacy to Adoption; From Bitcoin to Cryptocurrency: Debate Topic Expansion · ACL (1) 2019 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation › high-level test generation
system-level test generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Intelligent Interleaving of Scenarios: A Novel Approach to System Level Test Generation · DAC 2007 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Intelligent Interleaving of Scenarios: A Novel Approach to System Level Test Generation · DAC 2007 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batching · SODA 2002 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batching · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probing · 1.0dataset annotation · 1.0correctness classifier · 1.0benchmark evaluation · 1.0empirical study · 0.9active learning · 0.9empirical analysis · 0.7topic modeling · 0.4corpus-based expansion · 0.4decision tree learning · 0.1nonpreemptive scheduling · 0.1constant-factor approximation · 0.1throughput analysis · 0.1dynamic scenario interleaving · 0.1constraint solving · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Masked by Consensus: Disentangling Privileged Knowledge in LLM CorrectnessabstractHumans use introspection to evaluate their understanding through private internal states inaccessible to external observers.We investigate whether large language models possess similar privileged knowledge about answer correctness, information unavailable through external observation.We train correctness classifiers on question representations from both a model's own hidden states and external models, testing whether self-representations provide a performance advantage.On standard evaluation, we find no advantage: self-probes perform comparably to peer-model probes.We hypothesize this is due to high inter-model agreement of answer correctness.To isolate genuine privileged knowledge, we evaluate on disagreement subsets, where models produce conflicting predictions.Here, we discover domain-specific privileged knowledge: self-representations consistently outperform peer representations in factual knowledge tasks, but show no advantage in math reasoning.We further localize this domain asymmetry across model layers, finding that the factual advantage emerges progressively from early-to-mid layers onward, consistent with model-specific memory retrieval, while math reasoning shows no consistent advantage at any depth. Tomer Ashuach, Shai Gretz, Yoav Katz, Yonatan Belinkov, Liat Ein-Dor |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate modelsabstractPrevious studies observed that finetuned models may be better base models than the vanilla pretrained model.Such a model, finetuned on some source dataset, may provide a better starting point for a new finetuning process on a desired target dataset.Here, we perform a systematic analysis of this intertraining scheme, over a wide range of English classification tasks.Surprisingly, our analysis suggests that the potential intertraining gain can be analyzed independently for the target dataset under consideration, and for a base model being considered as a starting point.Hence, a performant model is generally strong, even if its training data was not aligned with the target dataset.Furthermore, we leverage our analysis to propose a practical and efficient approach to determine if and how to select a base model in real-world settings.Last, we release an updating ranking of best models in the HuggingFace hub per architecture. Leshem Choshen, Elad Venezian, Shachar Don-Yehiya, Noam Slonim, Yoav Katz |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2022 | Multi-Domain Targeted Sentiment AnalysisabstractOrith Toledo-Ronen, Matan Orbach, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Orith Toledo-Ronen, Matan Orbach, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | YASO: A Targeted Sentiment Analysis Evaluation Dataset for Open-Domain ReviewsabstractCurrent TSA evaluation in a cross-domain setup is restricted to the small set of review domains available in existing datasets.Such an evaluation is limited, and may not reflect true performance on sites like Amazon or Yelp that host diverse reviews from many domains.To address this gap, we present YASO -a new TSA evaluation dataset of open-domain user reviews.YASO contains 2215 English sentences from dozens of review domains, annotated with target terms and their sentiment.Our analysis verifies the reliability of these annotations, and explores the characteristics of the collected data.Benchmark results using five contemporary TSA systems show there is ample room for improvement on this challenging new dataset.YASO is available at github.com/IBM/yaso-tsa. Matan Orbach, Orith Toledo-Ronen, Artem Spector, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical StudyabstractLiat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Liat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP (1) | 9 |
| 2019 | From Surrogacy to Adoption; From Bitcoin to Cryptocurrency: Debate Topic ExpansionabstractRoy Bar-Haim, Dalia Krieger, Orith Toledo-Ronen, Lilach Edelstein, Yonatan Bilu, Alon Halfon, Yoav Katz, Amir Menczel, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019. Roy Bar-Haim, Dalia Krieger, Orith Toledo-Ronen, Lilach Edelstein, Yonatan Bilu, Alon Halfon, Yoav Katz, Amir Menczel, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2012 | Generating instruction streams using abstract CSPabstractOne of the challenges that processor level stimuli generators are facing is the need to generate stimuli that exercise microarchitectural mechanisms deep inside the verified processor. These scenarios require specific relations between the instructions participating in them. We present a new approach for processor-level scenario generation. The approach is based on creating an abstract constraint satisfaction problem, which captures the essence of the requested scenario. The generation of stimuli is done by interleaving between progress in the solution of the abstract CSP and generation of instructions. Compared with existing solutions of scenario generation, this approach yields improved coverage and reduced generation fail rate. Yoav Katz, Michal Rimon, Avi Ziv |
DATE | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning microarchitectural behaviors to improve stimuli generation qualityabstractMicroarchitectural information regarding various aspects of instruction execution can help processor-level stimuli generators more easily reach verification goals. While many such aspects are based on common microarchitectural concepts, their specific manifestations are highly design-specific. We propose using an automatic method for acquiring such microarchitectural knowledge and integrating it into the stimuli generator. We start by extracting microarchitectural data from simulation traces. This data is fed to a decision tree learning algorithm that produces rules for microarchitectural behavior of instructions; these rules are then integrated into the testing knowledge of the stimuli generator. This testing knowledge can provide users with the ability to better control the microarchitectural behavior of generated instructions, leading to higher quality test cases. Experimental results on the POWER7 processor showed that our proposed method can improve the microarchitectural coverage of the design. Yoav Katz, Michal Rimon, Avi Ziv, Gai Shaked |
DAC | 1 |
| 2009 | Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batchingabstractWe consider the following scheduling with batching problem that has many applications, for example, in multimedia-on-demand and manufacturing of integrated circuits. The input to the problem consists of n jobs and k parallel machines. Each job is associated with a set of time intervals in which it can be scheduled (given either explicitly or nonexplicitly), a weight, and a family. Each family is associated with a processing time. Jobs that belong to the same family can be batched and executed together on the same machine. The processing time of each batch is the processing time of the family of jobs it contains. The goal is to find a nonpreemptive schedule with batching that maximizes the weight of the scheduled jobs. We give constant factor (4 or 4 + ε) approximation algorithms for two variants of the problem, depending on the precise representation of the input. When the batch size is unbounded and each job is associated with a time window in which it can be processed, these approximation ratios reduce to 2 and 2 + ε, respectively. We also give approximation algorithms for two special cases when all release times are the same. Amotz Bar-Noy, Sudipto Guha, Yoav Katz, Joseph Naor, Baruch Schieber, Hadas Shachnai |
ACM Trans. Algorithms | 3 |
| 2007 | Intelligent Interleaving of Scenarios: A Novel Approach to System Level Test GenerationabstractParallelism in system architecture and design imposes a verification challenge as the exponential growth in the number of execution combinations becomes unwieldy. We report on a method for system-level test case generation. This method relies on dynamic interleaving of scenarios from the core level or sub-system level. We discuss the relevance of this method for the system level. We also describe a tool that implements this method and show how it was used in IBM for system verification of the Xbox 360 chip and power management in the cell processor, as well as verification of the pSeries eServers. We claim that this method shortened the system level verification cycle and allowed reuse in and across projects, which led to exposure of system-level bugs in a relatively short time. Shady Copty, Itai Jaeger, Yoav Katz, Michael Vinov |
DAC | 3 |
| 2006 | Constraint-Based Random Stimuli Generation for Hardware Verification
Yehuda Naveh, Michal Rimon, Itai Jaeger, Yoav Katz, Michael Vinov, Eitan Marcus, Gil Shurek |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2004 | Quality Improvement Methods for System-Level Stimuli GenerationabstractFunctional verification of systems is aimed at validating the integration of previously verified components. It deals with complex designs, and invariably suffers from scarce resources. We present a set of methods, collectively known as testing knowledge, aimed at increasing the quality of automatically generated system-level test-cases. Testing knowledge reduces the time and effort required to achieve high coverage of the verified design. Roy Emek, Itai Jaeger, Yoav Katz, Yehuda Naveh |
ICCD | 3 |
| 2002 | Throughput maximization of real-time scheduling with batching
Amotz Bar-Noy, Sudipto Guha, Yoav Katz, Joseph Naor, Baruch Schieber, Hadas Shachnai |
SODA | 3 |