Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Burgess

dblp:40/3214 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0823-2848ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Vision and language · 48% Generative modeling · 18% Video understanding and tracking · 8%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 53% Medical and health informatics · 47%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
1.722025
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation · CVPR 2025
MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.622025
BIOMEDICA: An Open Biomedical Image-Caption Archive, Dataset, and Vision-Language Models Derived from Scientific Literature · CVPR 2025
Micro-Bench: A Microscopy Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
1.122025
Video Action Differencing · ICLR 2025
MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research · CVPR 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
1.022025
Micro-Bench: A Microscopy Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2024
BIOMEDICA: An Open Biomedical Image-Caption Archive, Dataset, and Vision-Language Models Derived from Scientific Literature · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
benchmark construction
0.912025
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
CellFlux: Simulating Cellular Morphology Changes via Flow Matching · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.912025
MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question generation
multiple-choice question generation
0.912025
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.912025
BIOMEDICA: An Open Biomedical Image-Caption Archive, Dataset, and Vision-Language Models Derived from Scientific Literature · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.912025
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
Viewpoint Textual Inversion: Discovering Scene Representations and 3D View Control in 2D Diffusion Models · ECCV (64) 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling
scene representation
0.812024
Viewpoint Textual Inversion: Discovering Scene Representations and 3D View Control in 2D Diffusion Models · ECCV (64) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
textual inversion
0.812024
Viewpoint Textual Inversion: Discovering Scene Representations and 3D View Control in 2D Diffusion Models · ECCV (64) 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.312025
Video Action Differencing · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal evaluation
0.312025
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation · CVPR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
microscopy image analysis
0.312025
MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting
0.212024
Micro-Bench: A Microscopy Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Robot manipulation › contact modeling
frictional contact
0.012003
Experiments in nonsmooth control of distributed manipulation · ICRA 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

streaming pretraining · 1.7refinebot agent · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7chain-of-thought analysis · 1.7benchmark construction · 1.7image generative model · 0.9frame differencing · 0.9foundation model · 0.9flow matching · 0.9agentic workflow · 0.9agentic framework · 0.9LLM-based question conversion · 0.9weight interpolation · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MicroVQA: A Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark for Microscopy-Based Scientific Research
abstract
Scientific research demands sophisticated reasoning over multimodal data, a challenge especially prevalent in biology. Despite recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for AI-assisted research, existing multimodal reasoning benchmarks only target up to college-level difficulty, while research-level benchmarks emphasize lower-level perception, falling short of the complex multimodal reasoning needed for scientific discovery. To bridge this gap, we introduce MicroVQA, a visual-question answering (VQA) benchmark designed to assess three reasoning capabilities vital in research workflows: expert image understanding, hypothesis generation, and experiment proposal. MicroVQA consists of 1,042 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) curated by biology experts across diverse microscopy modalities, ensuring VQA samples represent real scientific practice. In constructing the benchmark, we find that standard MCQ generation methods induce language shortcuts, motivating a new two-stage pipeline: an optimized LLM prompt structures question-answer pairs into MCQs; then, an agent-based 'RefineBot' updates them to remove shortcuts. Benchmarking on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a peak performance of 53%; models with smaller LLMs only slightly underperform top models, suggesting that language-based reasoning is less challenging than multimodal reasoning; and tuning with scientific articles enhances performance. Expert analysis of chain-of-thought responses shows that perception errors are the most frequent, followed by knowledge errors and then overgeneralization errors. These insights highlight the challenges in multimodal scientific reasoning, showing MicroVQA is a valuable resource advancing AI-driven biomedical research. MicroVQA is available here, project here.
James Burgess, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, Laura Bravo-Sánchez, Alejandro Lozano, Sanket Rajan Gupte, Jesus G. Galaz-Montoya, Yuchang Su, Disha Bhowmik, Zachary Coman, Sarina M. Hasan, Alexandra Johannesson, William D. Leineweber, Malvika G. Nair, Ridhi Yarlagadda, Connor Zuraski, Wah Chiu, Sarah Cohen, Jan N. Hansen, Manuel D. Leonetti, Chad Liu, Emma Lundberg, Serena Yeung-Levy
CVPR1
2025 BIOMEDICA: An Open Biomedical Image-Caption Archive, Dataset, and Vision-Language Models Derived from Scientific Literature
abstract
The development of vision-language models (VLMs) is driven by large-scale and diverse multi-modal datasets. However, progress toward generalist biomedical VLMs is limited by the lack of annotated, publicly accessible datasets across biology and medicine. Existing efforts are limited to narrow domains, missing the full diversity of biomedical knowledge encoded in scientific literature. To address this gap, we introduce BIOMEDICA: a scalable, open-source framework to extract, annotate, and serialize the entirety of the PubMed Central Open Access subset into an easy-to-use, publicly accessible dataset. Our framework produces a comprehensive archive with over 24 million unique image-text pairs from over 6 million articles. Metadata and expert-guided annotations are additionally provided.We demonstrate the utility and accessibility of our resource by releasing BMC-CLIP, a suite of CLIP-style models continuously pre-trained on BIOMEDICA dataset via streaming (eliminating the need to download 27 TB of data locally). On average, our models achieve state-of-the-art performance across 40 tasks — spanning pathology, radiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, surgery, molecular biology, parasitology, and cell biology — excelling in zero-shot classification with 6.56% average improvement (as high as 29.8% and 17.5% in dermatology and ophthalmology, respectively) and stronger image-text retrieval while using 10x less compute. To foster reproducibility and collaboration, we release our codebase1,2and dataset3to the broader research community.
Alejandro Lozano, Min Woo Sun, James Burgess, Liangyu Chen 0005, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, Jeffrey Gu, Iván López 0001, Josiah Aklilu, Anita Rau, Austin Wolfgang Katzer, Collin Chiu, Alfred Seunghoon Song, Robert Tibshirani, Serena Yeung-Levy
CVPR3
2025 Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation
abstract
The rapid development of vision language models (VLMs) demands rigorous and reliable evaluation. However, current visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks often depend on open-ended questions, making accurate evaluation difficult due to the variability in natural language responses. To address this, we introduce AutoConverter, an agentic framework that automatically converts these open-ended questions into multiple-choice format, enabling objective evaluation while reducing the costly multiple-choice question creation process. Our experiments demonstrate that AutoConverter can generate correct and challenging multiple-choice questions, with VLMs demonstrating consistently similar or lower accuracy on these questions compared to human-created ones. Using AutoConverter, we construct VMCBench, a benchmark created by transforming 20 existing VQA datasets into a unified multiple-choice format, totaling 9,018 questions. We comprehensively evaluate 33 state-of-the-art VLMs on VM-CBench, setting a new standard for scalable, consistent, and reproducible VLM evaluation.
Yuchang Su, James Burgess, Elaine Sui, Chenyu Wang 0003, Josiah Aklilu, Alejandro Lozano, Anjiang Wei, Ludwig Schmidt, Serena Yeung-Levy
CVPR5
2025 Video Action Differencing
abstract
How do two individuals differ when performing the same action? In this work, we introduce Video Action Differencing (VidDiff), the novel task of identifying subtle differences between videos of the same action, which has numerous applications, such as coaching and skill learning. To enable development on this new task, we first create VidDiffBench, a benchmark dataset containing 549 video pairs, with human annotations of 4,469 fine-grained action differences and 2,075 timestamps indicating where these differences occur. Our experiments demonstrate that VidDiffBench poses a significant challenge for state-of-the-art large multimodal models (LMMs), such as GPT-4o and Qwen2-VL. By analyzing the failure cases of LMMs on VidDiffBench, we highlight two key challenges for this task: localizing relevant sub-actions over two videos and fine-grained frame comparison. To overcome these, we propose the VidDiff method, an agentic workflow that breaks the task into three stages: action difference proposal, keyframe localization, and frame differencing, each stage utilizing specialized foundation models. To encourage future research in this new task, we release the benchmark and code.
James Burgess, Anita Rau, Alejandro Lozano, Lisa Dunlap, Trevor Darrell, Serena Yeung-Levy
ICLR1
2025 CellFlux: Simulating Cellular Morphology Changes via Flow Matching
abstract
Building a virtual cell capable of accurately simulating cellular behaviors in silico has long been a dream in computational biology. We introduce CellFlux, an image-generative model that simulates cellular morphology changes induced by chemical and genetic perturbations using flow matching. Unlike prior methods, CellFlux models distribution-wise transformations from unperturbed to perturbed cell states, effectively distinguishing actual perturbation effects from experimental artifacts such as batch effects—a major challenge in biological data. Evaluated on chemical (BBBC021), genetic (RxRx1), and combined perturbation (JUMP) datasets, CellFlux generates biologically meaningful cell images that faithfully capture perturbation-specific morphological changes, achieving a 35% improvement in FID scores and a 12% increase in mode-of-action prediction accuracy over existing methods. Additionally, CellFlux enables continuous interpolation between cellular states, providing a potential tool for studying perturbation dynamics. These capabilities mark a significant step toward realizing virtual cell modeling for biomedical research. Project page: https://yuhui-zh15.github.io/CellFlux/.
Yuchang Su, Chenyu Wang 0003, Tianhong Li, Zoe Wefers, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, James Burgess, Daisy Ding, Alejandro Lozano, Emma Lundberg, Serena Yeung-Levy
ICML7
2025 RenderMan XPU: A Hybrid CPU+GPU Renderer for Interactive and Final-frame Rendering
Per H. Christensen, Julian Fong, Charlie Kilpatrick, Francisco Gonzalez, Srinath Ravichandran, Akshay Shah, Ethan Jaszewski, Stephen Friedman, James Burgess, Trina M. Roy, Tom Nettleship, Meghana Seshadri, Susan Salituro
Comput. Graph. Forum9
2024 Viewpoint Textual Inversion: Discovering Scene Representations and 3D View Control in 2D Diffusion Models
James Burgess, Kuan-Chieh Wang, Serena Yeung-Levy
ECCV (64)1
2024 Micro-Bench: A Microscopy Benchmark for Vision-Language Understanding
abstract
Recent advances in microscopy have enabled the rapid generation of terabytes of image data in cell biology and biomedical research. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer a promising solution for large-scale biological image analysis, enhancing researchers’ efficiency, identifying new image biomarkers, and accelerating hypothesis generation and scientific discovery. However, there is a lack of standardized, diverse, and large-scale vision-language benchmarks to evaluate VLMs’ perception and cognition capabilities in biological image understanding. To address this gap, we introduce Micro-Bench, an expert-curated benchmark encompassing 24 biomedical tasks across various scientific disciplines (biology, pathology), microscopy modalities (electron, fluorescence, light), scales (subcellular, cellular, tissue), and organisms in both normal and abnormal states. We evaluate state-of-the-art biomedical, pathology, and general VLMs on Micro-Bench and find that: i) current models struggle on all categories, even for basic tasks such as distinguishing microscopy modalities; ii) current specialist models fine-tuned on biomedical data often perform worse than generalist models; iii) fine-tuning in specific microscopy domains can cause catastrophic forgetting, eroding prior biomedical knowledge encoded in their base model. iv) weight interpolation between fine-tuned and pre-trained models offers one solution to forgetting and improves general performance across biomedical tasks. We release Micro-Bench under a permissive license to accelerate the research and development of microscopy foundation models.
Alejandro Lozano, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, James Burgess, Sanket Rajan Gupte, Alyssa Unell, Serena Yeung-Levy
NeurIPS3
2003 Experiments in nonsmooth control of distributed manipulation
abstract
This paper describes an experimental modular distributed manipulation system upon which one can implement a variety of control schemes. We have shown elsewhere that when one includes the nonsmooth effects of friction into a model of distributed manipulation, nonsmooth feedback laws must generally be used to control distributed manipulators. We summarize results obtained with this experimental system that confirm the validity of control schemes proposed by the authors in recent papers. We describe the control algorithms in some detail and include specifics of the experimental set-up and experimental results.
Todd D. Murphey, Joel W. Burdick, James Burgess, Andrew Homyk
ICRA3