Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phil Sallee

dblp:40/3590 · also Phil A. Sallee, Philip A. Sallee · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 83% Performance modeling and evaluation · 17%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.122002
Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002
Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
multi-scale representation
0.012002
Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.012002
Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002
Image and video processing
sparse representation
0.012002
Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002
Image and video processing
image representation
0.012000
Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture · NIPS 2000
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › branch prediction
branch classification
0.012000
Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
branch prediction
0.012000
Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › branch prediction
two-level adaptive branch prediction
0.012000
Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
sparsity prior
0.012002
Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization › program behavior
branch behavior
0.012000
Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.012000
Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

steerable pyramid · 0.1sparse priors · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1wavelet pyramid · 0.1sparse coding · 0.1simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Image denoising using learned overcomplete representations
abstract
We describe a method for learning sparse multiscale image representations using a sparse prior distribution over the basis function coefficients. The prior consists of a mixture of a Gaussian and a Dirac delta function, and thus encourages coefficients to have exact zero values. Coefficients for an image are computed by sampling from the resulting posterior distribution with a Gibbs sampler. Denoising using the learned image model is demonstrated for some standard test images, with results that compare favorably with other denoising methods.
Phil Sallee, Bruno A. Olshausen
ICIP (3)1
2003 Model-Based Steganography
Phil Sallee
IWDW1
2002 Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations
abstract
We describe a method for learning sparse multiscale image repre- sentations using a sparse prior distribution over the basis function coe(cid:14)cients. The prior consists of a mixture of a Gaussian and a Dirac delta function, and thus encourages coe(cid:14)cients to have exact zero values. Coe(cid:14)cients for an image are computed by sampling from the resulting posterior distribution with a Gibbs sampler. The learned basis is similar to the Steerable Pyramid basis, and yields slightly higher SNR for the same number of active coe(cid:14)cients. De- noising using the learned image model is demonstrated for some standard test images, with results that compare favorably with other denoising methods.
Phil Sallee, Bruno A. Olshausen
NIPS1
2000 Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis
abstract
Recent studies have shown significantly improved branch prediction through the use of branch classification. By separating static branches into groups, or classes, with similar dynamic behavior predictors may be selected that are best suited for each class. Previous methods have classified branches according to taken rate (or bias). We propose a new metric for branch classification: branch transition rate, which is defined as the number of times a branch changes direction between taken and not taken during execution. We show that transition rate is a more appropriate indicator of branch behavior than taken rate for determining predictor performance. When both metrics are combined, an even clearer picture of dynamic branch behavior emerges, in which expected predictor performance for a branch is closely correlated with its combined taken and transition rate class. Using this classification, a small group of branches is identified for which two-level predictors are ineffective.
Michael Haungs, Phil Sallee, Matthew K. Farrens
HPCA2
2000 Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture
abstract
We show how a wavelet basis may be adapted to best represent natural images in terms of sparse coefficients. The wavelet basis, which may be either complete or overcomplete, is specified by a small number of spatial functions which are repeated across space and combined in a recursive fashion so as to be self-similar across scale. These functions are adapted to minimize the estimated code length under a model that assumes images are composed of a linear superposition of sparse, independent components. When adapted to natural images, the wavelet bases take on different orientations and they evenly tile the orientation domain, in stark contrast to the standard, non-oriented wavelet bases used in image compression. When the basis set is allowed to be overcomplete, it also yields higher coding efficiency than standard wavelet bases.
Bruno A. Olshausen, Phil Sallee, Michael S. Lewicki
NIPS2