Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phil Sallee
dblp:40/3590 · also Phil A. Sallee, Philip A. Sallee
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 83% Performance modeling and evaluation · 17% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.1 | 2 | 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002 Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture · NIPS 2000 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
multi-scale representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002 |
Image and video processing
sparse representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002 |
Image and video processing
image representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid Architecture · NIPS 2000 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › branch prediction
branch classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
branch prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › branch prediction
two-level adaptive branch prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior distribution
sparsity prior |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image Representations · NIPS 2002 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization › program behavior
branch behavior |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification Analysis · HPCA 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
steerable pyramid · 0.1sparse priors · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1wavelet pyramid · 0.1sparse coding · 0.1simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Image denoising using learned overcomplete representationsabstractWe describe a method for learning sparse multiscale image representations using a sparse prior distribution over the basis function coefficients. The prior consists of a mixture of a Gaussian and a Dirac delta function, and thus encourages coefficients to have exact zero values. Coefficients for an image are computed by sampling from the resulting posterior distribution with a Gibbs sampler. Denoising using the learned image model is demonstrated for some standard test images, with results that compare favorably with other denoising methods. Phil Sallee, Bruno A. Olshausen |
ICIP (3) | 1 |
| 2003 | Model-Based Steganography
Phil Sallee |
IWDW | 1 |
| 2002 | Learning Sparse Multiscale Image RepresentationsabstractWe describe a method for learning sparse multiscale image repre- sentations using a sparse prior distribution over the basis function coe(cid:14)cients. The prior consists of a mixture of a Gaussian and a Dirac delta function, and thus encourages coe(cid:14)cients to have exact zero values. Coe(cid:14)cients for an image are computed by sampling from the resulting posterior distribution with a Gibbs sampler. The learned basis is similar to the Steerable Pyramid basis, and yields slightly higher SNR for the same number of active coe(cid:14)cients. De- noising using the learned image model is demonstrated for some standard test images, with results that compare favorably with other denoising methods. Phil Sallee, Bruno A. Olshausen |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2000 | Branch Transition Rate: A New Metric for Improved Branch Classification AnalysisabstractRecent studies have shown significantly improved branch prediction through the use of branch classification. By separating static branches into groups, or classes, with similar dynamic behavior predictors may be selected that are best suited for each class. Previous methods have classified branches according to taken rate (or bias). We propose a new metric for branch classification: branch transition rate, which is defined as the number of times a branch changes direction between taken and not taken during execution. We show that transition rate is a more appropriate indicator of branch behavior than taken rate for determining predictor performance. When both metrics are combined, an even clearer picture of dynamic branch behavior emerges, in which expected predictor performance for a branch is closely correlated with its combined taken and transition rate class. Using this classification, a small group of branches is identified for which two-level predictors are ineffective. Michael Haungs, Phil Sallee, Matthew K. Farrens |
HPCA | 2 |
| 2000 | Learning Sparse Image Codes using a Wavelet Pyramid ArchitectureabstractWe show how a wavelet basis may be adapted to best represent natural images in terms of sparse coefficients. The wavelet basis, which may be either complete or overcomplete, is specified by a small number of spatial functions which are repeated across space and combined in a recursive fashion so as to be self-similar across scale. These functions are adapted to minimize the estimated code length under a model that assumes images are composed of a linear superposition of sparse, independent components. When adapted to natural images, the wavelet bases take on different orientations and they evenly tile the orientation domain, in stark contrast to the standard, non-oriented wavelet bases used in image compression. When the basis set is allowed to be overcomplete, it also yields higher coding efficiency than standard wavelet bases. Bruno A. Olshausen, Phil Sallee, Michael S. Lewicki |
NIPS | 2 |