Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael L. Gibson

dblp:40/4313 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Empirical software engineering · 55% Requirements engineering and software design · 45%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data warehouse
0.012003
Perceived Influences on Implementing Data Warehousing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2003
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.011998
Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1998
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
practitioner survey
0.012003
Perceived Influences on Implementing Data Warehousing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2003
Requirements engineering and software design
software design methodology
0.011998
Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.1exploratory factor analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Perceived Influences on Implementing Data Warehousing
abstract
This study surveyed data warehousing implementation project participants to determine what aspects they perceived should contribute to the implementation process. The respondents included: functional managers/staff, IS managers/staff, and consultants. The study identified eight significant factors that participants perceived should impact data warehouse implementation.
Robert Grover Little Jr., Michael L. Gibson
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2001 Response to 'Comments on Factors that Impact the Implementation of a Systems Development Methodology'
abstract
This correspondence is a response to "Comments on Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology," by Yadav et al. [24]. We are gratified to see that researchers are closely examining our work. However, we must take issue with the theoretical and methodological issues raised by Yadav et at. [24]. Simply put, the issues raised do not adversely affect our study, its theoretical foundation, its research methodology, its statistical methodology, or its results.
Tom L. Roberts Jr., Michael L. Gibson, R. Kelly Rainer Jr., Kent T. Fields
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1998 Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology
abstract
Presents the findings of empirical research from 61 companies, mostly from the USA, to identify the factors that may impact implementation of a system development methodology (SDM). The study uses a survey instrument to identify the SDM implementation factors. The survey focused on the perspective of the primary constituents: functional managers, information systems managers, system personnel and external consultants. The study uses an exploratory factor analysis that identifies five factors important to implementing an SDM: organizational SDM transition, functional management involvement/support, SDM transition, the use of models and external support. The research findings have important implications for further research and the practice of system development. For researchers, it points to important measures in the implementation and use of SDMs that may be further verified and extended in subsequent research. For practitioners, it provides a general guide to the important aspects to consider in the implementation and use of an SDM.
Tom L. Roberts Jr., Michael L. Gibson, R. Kelly Rainer Jr., Kent T. Fields
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1991 Computer Aided Software Engineering: Facilitating the Path for True Software and Knowledge Engineering
abstract
An emerging enterprise-wide orientation evidenced by comprehensive enterprise modeling supported by a technological architecture that includes computer aided software engineering (CASE) tools may empower knowledge and software engineers greater than ever before. An enterprise-wide orientation seeks to carry the strategy of an organization throughout its operations. Enterprise modeling makes it possible to have this panoramic view of the enterprise. An advanced technological architecture that includes CASE empowers enterprise functional personnel, knowledge engineers, and software engineers with the methodological and technological platform required to produce a comprehensive enterprise model. Current environmental trends are influencing how well organizations implement this enterprise-wide orientation, modeling perspective, and the methodological and technological platform.
Michael L. Gibson, Charles A. Snyder
Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng.1