Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chionh Wei Peng

dblp:40/4946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
0.912025
Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding
0.912025
Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › neuro-symbolic reasoning
neural theorem proving
0.912025
Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.912025
Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft unification · 0.9logic programming · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods
abstract
Neural Theorem Provers (NTPs) present a promising framework for neuro-symbolic reasoning, combining end-to-end differentiability with the interpretability of symbolic logic programming. However, optimizing NTPs remains a significant challenge due to their complex objective landscape and gradient sparcity. On the other hand, Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) methods offer smooth optimization with well-defined learning objectives but often lack interpretability. In this work, we propose several strategies to integrate the strengths of NTPs and KGEs, and demonstrate substantial improvements in both accuracy and computational efficiency. Specifically, we show that by leveraging the strength of structural learning in KGEs, we can greatly improve NTPs’ poorly structured embedding space, while by substituting NTPs with efficient KGE operations, we can significantly reduce evaluation time by over 1000$\times$ on large-scale dataset such as WN18RR with a mild accuracy trade-off.
Xuanming Cui, Chionh Wei Peng, Adriel Kuek, Ser-Nam Lim
ICML2