Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chionh Wei Peng
dblp:40/4946
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › neuro-symbolic reasoning
neural theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft unification · 0.9logic programming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving Soft Unification with Knowledge Graph Embedding MethodsabstractNeural Theorem Provers (NTPs) present a promising framework for neuro-symbolic reasoning, combining end-to-end differentiability with the interpretability of symbolic logic programming. However, optimizing NTPs remains a significant challenge due to their complex objective landscape and gradient sparcity. On the other hand, Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) methods offer smooth optimization with well-defined learning objectives but often lack interpretability. In this work, we propose several strategies to integrate the strengths of NTPs and KGEs, and demonstrate substantial improvements in both accuracy and computational efficiency. Specifically, we show that by leveraging the strength of structural learning in KGEs, we can greatly improve NTPs’ poorly structured embedding space, while by substituting NTPs with efficient KGE operations, we can significantly reduce evaluation time by over 1000$\times$ on large-scale dataset such as WN18RR with a mild accuracy trade-off. Xuanming Cui, Chionh Wei Peng, Adriel Kuek, Ser-Nam Lim |
ICML | 2 |