Xiao Yuan 0002

dblp:40/5746-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0205-6545ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 94% Computational complexity · 6%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
classical shadow
0.912025
Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum States · ICLR 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum learning
0.912025
Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum States · ICLR 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
quantum state complexity
0.912025
Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum States · ICLR 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum resource theory
coherence distillation
0.412019
One-Shot Coherence Distillation: Towards Completing the Picture · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum information theory
one-shot information theory
0.412019
One-Shot Coherence Distillation: Towards Completing the Picture · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum resource theory
0.412019
One-Shot Coherence Distillation: Towards Completing the Picture · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2019
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.312025
Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum States · ICLR 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
non-locality and contextuality
0.212016
Bridging the gap between general probabilistic theories and the device-independent framework for nonlocality and contextuality · Inf. Comput. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning algorithms · 0.9classical shadow · 0.9semidefinite programming · 0.4hypothesis testing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning the Complexity of Weakly Noisy Quantum States
abstract
Quantifying the complexity of quantum states is a longstanding key problem in various subfields of science, ranging from quantum computing to the black-hole theory. The lower bound on quantum pure state complexity has been shown to grow linearly with system size [J. Haferkamp et al., 2022, *Nat. Phys.*]. However, extending this result to noisy circuit environments, which better reflect real quantum devices, remains an open challenge. In this paper, we explore the complexity of weakly noisy quantum states via the quantum learning method. We present an efficient learning algorithm, that leverages the classical shadow representation of target quantum states, to predict the circuit complexity of weakly noisy quantum states. Our algorithm is proved to be optimal in terms of sample complexity accompanied with polynomial classical processing time. Our result builds a bridge between the learning algorithm and quantum state complexity, meanwhile highlighting the power of learning algorithm in characterizing intrinsic properties of quantum states.
Bujiao Wu, Yanqi Song, Xiao Yuan 0002, Jingbo Wang 0001
ICLR4
2019 One-Shot Coherence Distillation: Towards Completing the Picture
abstract
The resource framework of quantum coherence was introduced by Baumgratz, Cramer, and Plenio [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)] and further developed by Winter and Yang [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120404 (2016)]. We consider the one-shot problem of distilling pure coherence from a single instance of a given resource state. Specifically, we determine the distillable coherence with a given fidelity under incoherent operations (IO) through a generalization of the Winter-Yang protocol. This is compared to the distillable coherence under maximal incoherent operations (MIO) and dephasing-covariant incoherent operations (DIO), which can be cast as a semidefinite programme, that has been presented previously by Regula et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 010401 (2018)]. Our results are given in terms of a smoothed min-relative entropy distance from the incoherent set of states, and a variant of the hypothesis-testing relative entropy distance, respectively. The one-shot distillable coherence is also related to one-shot randomness extraction. Moreover, from the one-shot formulas under IO, MIO, and DIO, we can recover the optimal distillable rate in the many-copy asymptotics, yielding the relative entropy of coherence. These results can be compared with previous work by some of the present authors [Zhao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 070403 (2018)] on one-shot coherence formation under IO, MIO, DIO and also SIO. This shows that the amount of distillable coherence is essentially the same for IO, DIO, and MIO, despite the fact that the three classes of operations are very different. We also relate the distillable coherence under strictly incoherent operations (SIO) to a constrained hypothesis testing problem and explicitly show the existence of bound coherence under SIO in the asymptotic regime.
Qi Zhao 0014, Yunchao Liu 0002, Xiao Yuan 0002, Eric Chitambar, Andreas J. Winter 0002
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2016 Bridging the gap between general probabilistic theories and the device-independent framework for nonlocality and contextuality
Giulio Chiribella, Xiao Yuan 0002
Inf. Comput.2