Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Lüdemann

dblp:40/5893 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data processing
0.112008
TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolite quantification
0.112008
TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics
0.112008
TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012004
Hypothesis-driven approach to predict transcriptional units from gene expression data · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
transcriptional unit prediction
0.012004
Hypothesis-driven approach to predict transcriptional units from gene expression data · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
metabolic flux analysis
0.012008
TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression
0.012004
CSB.DB: a comprehensive systems-biology database · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
operon prediction
0.012004
Hypothesis-driven approach to predict transcriptional units from gene expression data · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
pathway database
0.012004
PaVESy: Pathway Visualization and Editing System · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mass isotopomer resolution · 0.1relational database design · 0.0co-response analysis · 0.0co-clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Typical GC-MS-based metabolite profiling experiments may comprise hundreds of chromatogram files, which each contain up to 1000 mass spectral tags (MSTs). MSTs are the characteristic patterns of approximately 25-250 fragment ions and respective isotopomers, which are generated after gas chromatography (GC) by electron impact ionization (EI) of the separated chemical molecules. These fragment ions are subsequently detected by time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). MSTs of profiling experiments are typically reported as a list of ions, which are characterized by mass, chromatographic retention index (RI) or retention time (RT), and arbitrary abundance. The first two parameters allow the identification, the later the quantification of the represented chemical compounds. Many software tools have been reported for the pre-processing, the so-called curve resolution and deconvolution, of GC-(EI-TOF)-MS files. Pre-processing tools generate numerical data matrices, which contain all aligned MSTs and samples of an experiment. This process, however, is error prone mainly due to (i) the imprecise RI or RT alignment of MSTs and (ii) the high complexity of biological samples. This complexity causes co-elution of compounds and as a consequence non-selective, in other words impure MSTs. The selection and validation of optimal fragment ions for the specific and selective quantification of simultaneously eluting compounds is, therefore, mandatory. Currently validation is performed in most laboratories under human supervision. So far no software tool supports the non-targeted and user-independent quality assessment of the data matrices prior to statistical analysis. TagFinder may fill this gap. STRATEGY: TagFinder facilitates the analysis of all fragment ions, which are observed in GC-(EI-TOF)-MS profiling experiments. The non-targeted approach allows the discovery of novel and unexpected compounds. In addition, mass isotopomer resolution is maintained by TagFinder processing. This feature is essential for metabolic flux analyses and highly useful, but not required for metabolite profiling. Whenever possible, TagFinder gives precedence to chemical means of standardization, for example, the use of internal reference compounds for retention time calibration or quantitative standardization. In addition, external standardization is supported for both compound identification and calibration. The workflow of TagFinder comprises, (i) the import of fragment ion data, namely mass, time and arbitrary abundance (intensity), from a chromatography file interchange format or from peak lists provided by other chromatogram pre-processing software, (ii) the annotation of sample information and grouping of samples into classes, (iii) the RI calculation, (iv) the binning of observed fragment ions of equal mass from different chromatograms into RI windows, (v) the combination of these bins, so-called mass tags, into time groups of co-eluting fragment ions, (vi) the test of time groups for intensity correlated mass tags, (vii) the data matrix generation and (viii) the extraction of selective mass tags supported by compound identification. Thus, TagFinder supports both non-targeted fingerprinting analyses and metabolite targeted profiling. AVAILABILITY: Exemplary TagFinder workspaces and test data sets are made available upon request to the contact authors. TagFinder is made freely available for academic use from http://www-en.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/03-research/researchGroups/01-dept1/Root_Metabolism/smp/TagFinder/index.html.
Alexander Lüdemann, Katrin Strassburg, Alexander Erban, Joachim Kopka
Bioinform.1
2004 PaVESy: Pathway Visualization and Editing System
abstract
UNLABELLED: A data managing system for editing and visualization of biological pathways is presented. The main component of PaVESy (Pathway Visualization and Editing System) is a relational SQL database system. The database design allows storage of biological objects, such as metabolites, proteins, genes and respective relations, which are required to assemble metabolic and regulatory biological interactions. The database model accommodates highly flexible annotation of biological objects by user-defined attributes. In addition, specific roles of objects are derived from these attributes in the context of user-defined interactions, e.g. in the course of pathway generation or during editing of the database content. Furthermore, the user may organize and arrange the database content within a folder structure and is free to group and annotate database objects of interest within customizable subsets. Thus, we allow an individualized view on the database content and facilitate user customization. A JAVA-based class library was developed, which serves as the database programming interface to PaVESy. This API provides classes, which implement the concepts of object persistence in SQL databases, such as entries, interactions, annotations, folders and subsets. We created editing and visualization tools for navigation in and visualization of the database content. User approved pathway assemblies are stored and may be retrieved for continued modification, annotation and export. Data export is interfaced with a range of network visualization programs, such as Pajek or other software allowing import of SBML or GML data format. AVAILABILITY: http://pavsey.mpimp-golm.mpg.de
Alexander Lüdemann, Daniel Weicht, Joachim Selbig, Joachim Kopka
Bioinform.1
2004 Hypothesis-driven approach to predict transcriptional units from gene expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: A major issue in computational biology is the reconstruction of functional relationships among genes, for example the definition of regulatory or biochemical pathways. One step towards this aim is the elucidation of transcriptional units, which are characterized by co-responding changes in mRNA expression levels. These units of genes will allow the generation of hypotheses about respective functional interrelationships. Thus, the focus of analysis currently moves from well-established functional assignment through comparison of protein and DNA sequences towards analysis of transcriptional co-response. Tools that allow deducing common control of gene expression have the potential to complement and extend routine BLAST comparisons, because gene function may be inferred from common transcriptional control. RESULTS: We present a co-clustering strategy of genome sequence information and gene expression data, which was applied to identify transcriptional units within diverse compendia of expression profiles. The phenomenon of prokaryotic operons was selected as an ideal test case to generate well-founded hypotheses about transcriptional units. The existence of overlapping and ambiguous operon definitions allowed the investigation of constitutive and conditional expression of transcriptional units in independent gene expression experiments of Escherichia coli. Our approach allowed identification of operons with high accuracy. Furthermore, both constitutive mRNA co-response as well as conditional differences became apparent. Thus, we were able to generate insight into the possible biological relevance of gene co-response. We conclude that the suggested strategy will be amenable in general to the identification of transcriptional units beyond the chosen example of E.coli operons. AVAILABILITY: The analyses of E.coli transcript data presented here are available upon request or at http://csbdb.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/
Dirk Steinhauser, Björn H. Junker, Alexander Lüdemann, Joachim Selbig, Joachim Kopka
Bioinform.3
2004 CSB.DB: a comprehensive systems-biology database
abstract
SUMMARY: The open access comprehensive systems-biology database (CSB.DB) presents the results of bio-statistical analyses on gene expression data in association with additional biochemical and physiological knowledge. The main aim of this database platform is to provide tools that support insight into life's complexity pyramid with a special focus on the integration of data from transcript and metabolite profiling experiments. The central part of CSB.DB, which we describe in this applications note, is a set of co-response databases that currently focus on the three key model organisms, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. CSB.DB gives easy access to the results of large-scale co-response analyses, which are currently based exclusively on the publicly available compendia of transcript profiles. By scanning for the best co-responses among changing transcript levels, CSB.DB allows to infer hypotheses on the functional interaction of genes. These hypotheses are novel and not accessible through analysis of sequence homology. The database enables the search for pairs of genes and larger units of genes, which are under common transcriptional control. In addition, statistical tools are offered to the user, which allow validation and comparison of those co-responses that were discovered by gene queries performed on the currently available set of pre-selectable datasets. AVAILABILITY: All co-response databases can be accessed through the CSB.DB Web server (http://csbdb.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/).
Dirk Steinhauser, Björn Usadel, Alexander Lüdemann, Oliver Thimm, Joachim Kopka
Bioinform.3