Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sam Lang

dblp:40/6412 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
interoperability
0.112005
State and events for Web services: a comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations · HPDC 2005
Distributed systems
publish/subscribe systems
0.112005
State and events for Web services: a comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations · HPDC 2005
Distributed systems › service-oriented architecture
web services
0.112005
State and events for Web services: a comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations · HPDC 2005
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 State and events for Web services: a comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations
abstract
The Web services resource framework defines conventions for managing state in distributed systems based on Web services, and WS-notification defines topic-based publish/subscribe mechanisms. We analyze five independent and quite different implementations of these specifications from the perspectives of architecture, functionality, standards compliance, performance, and interoperability. We identify both commonalities among the different systems (e.g., similar dispatching and SOAP processing mechanisms) and differences (e.g., security, programming models, and performance). Our results provide insights into effective implementation approaches. Our results may also provide application developers, system architects, and deployers with guidance in identifying the right implementation for their requirements and in determining how best to use that implementation and what to expect with regard to performance and interoperability.
Marty Humphrey, Glenn S. Wasson, Keith R. Jackson, Joshua Boverhof, Matt Rodriguez, Jarek Gawor, Joseph Bester, Sam Lang, Ian T. Foster, Sam Meder, Stephen Pickles, Mark McKeown
HPDC8
2004 Fine-grained authorization for job execution in the Grid: design and implementation
abstract
Abstract In this paper, we describe our work on enabling fine‐grained authorization for resource usage and management. We address the need of virtual organizations to enforce their own polices in addition to those of the resource owners, with regards to both resource consumption and job management. To implement this design, we propose changes and extensions to the Globus Toolkit's version 2 resource management mechanism. We describe the prototype and policy language that we have designed to express fine‐grained policies and present an analysis of our solution. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Kate Keahey, Von Welch, Sam Lang, Sam Meder
Concurr. Pract. Exp.3