Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Peter Molzberger

dblp:40/6527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › human factors in software engineering
developer cognition		 0.011983
Aesthetics and programming · CHI 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Aesthetics and programming
abstract
The paper at hand is based on interviews with a total of eight so-called "superprogrammers", software people, who show exceptional performance quantitatively as well as qualitatively. It becomes apparent that these people do not experience programming as a purely rational activity, but that for them it possesses strong intuitive components.
Peter Molzberger
 CHI1