Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Will Roberts

dblp:40/6993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-5736-5244ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › verb semantics
aspectual classification
0.412019
Annotation and Automatic Classification of Aspectual Categories · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.322019
A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification · EMNLP 2014
Annotation and Automatic Classification of Aspectual Categories · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › verb semantics
selectional preference
0.212014
A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
verb classification
0.212014
A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification · EMNLP 2014
Data mining
clustering
0.112014
A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification · EMNLP 2014
Data mining › clustering
unsupervised clustering
0.112014
A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification · EMNLP 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised classification · 0.4corpus annotation · 0.4unsupervised noun class induction · 0.4selectional preference model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Annotation and Automatic Classification of Aspectual Categories
abstract
We present the first annotated resource for the aspectual classification of German verb tokens in their clausal context. We use aspectual features compatible with the plurality of aspectual classifications in previous work and treat aspectual ambiguity systematically. We evaluate our corpus by using it to train supervised classifiers to automatically assign aspectual categories to verbs in context, permitting favourable comparisons to previous work.
Markus Egg, Helena Prepens, Will Roberts
ACL (1)3
2018 A Large Automatically-Acquired All-Words List of Multiword Expressions Scored for Compositionality
Will Roberts, Markus Egg
LREC1
2014 Subcategorisation Acquisition from Raw Text for a Free Word-Order Language
abstract
We describe a state-of-the-art automatic system that can acquire subcategorisation frames from raw text for a free word-order language.We use it to construct a subcategorisation lexicon of German verbs from a large Web page corpus.With an automatic verb classification paradigm we evaluate our subcategorisation lexicon against a previous classification of German verbs; the lexicon produced by our system performs better than the best previous results.
Will Roberts, Markus Egg, Valia Kordoni
EACL1
2014 A Comparison of Selectional Preference Models for Automatic Verb Classification
abstract
We present a comparison of different selectional preference models and evaluate them on an automatic verb classification task in German.We find that all the models we compare are effective for verb clustering; the best-performing model uses syntactic information to induce nouns classes from unlabelled data in an unsupervised manner.A very simple model based on lexical preferences is also found to perform well.
Will Roberts, Markus Egg
EMNLP1
2012 Using Verb Subcategorization for Word Sense Disambiguation
Will Roberts, Valia Kordoni
LREC1