Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marie Ouimet

dblp:40/7012 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Graph learning · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
out-of-sample extension
0.012003
Out-of-Sample Extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, Eigenmaps, and Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2003
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph clustering
spectral clustering
0.012003
Out-of-Sample Extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, Eigenmaps, and Spectral Clustering · NIPS 2003
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Learning Eigenfunctions Links Spectral Embedding and Kernel PCA
abstract
In this letter, we show a direct relation between spectral embedding methods and kernel principal components analysis and how both are special cases of a more general learning problem: learning the principal eigenfunctions of an operator defined from a kernel and the unknown data-generating density. Whereas spectral embedding methods provided only coordinates for the training points, the analysis justifies a simple extension to out-of-sample examples (the Nyström formula) for multidimensional scaling (MDS), spectral clustering, Laplacian eigenmaps, locally linear embedding (LLE), and Isomap. The analysis provides, for all such spectral embedding methods, the definition of a loss function, whose empirical average is minimized by the traditional algorithms. The asymptotic expected value of that loss defines a generalization performance and clarifies what these algorithms are trying to learn. Experiments with LLE, Isomap, spectral clustering, and MDS show that this out-of-sample embedding formula generalizes well, with a level of error comparable to the effect of small perturbations of the training set on the embedding.
Yoshua Bengio, Olivier Delalleau, Nicolas Le Roux, Jean-François Paiement, Pascal Vincent, Marie Ouimet
Neural Comput.6
2003 Out-of-Sample Extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, Eigenmaps, and Spectral Clustering
abstract
Several unsupervised learning algorithms based on an eigendecompo- sition provide either an embedding or a clustering only for given train- ing points, with no straightforward extension for out-of-sample examples short of recomputing eigenvectors. This paper provides a unified frame- work for extending Local Linear Embedding (LLE), Isomap, Laplacian Eigenmaps, Multi-Dimensional Scaling (for dimensionality reduction) as well as for Spectral Clustering. This framework is based on seeing these algorithms as learning eigenfunctions of a data-dependent kernel. Numerical experiments show that the generalizations performed have a level of error comparable to the variability of the embedding algorithms due to the choice of training data.
Yoshua Bengio, Jean-François Paiement, Pascal Vincent, Olivier Delalleau, Nicolas Le Roux, Marie Ouimet
NIPS6