EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunqiao Zhang
dblp:40/9913
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 67% Cloud and datacenter computing · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter storage |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Facebook's Tectonic Filesystem: Efficiency from Exascale · FAST 2021 |
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Facebook's Tectonic Filesystem: Efficiency from Exascale · FAST 2021 |
Storage systems › distributed storage
exascale storage system |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Facebook's Tectonic Filesystem: Efficiency from Exascale · FAST 2021 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationales · SIGIR 2011 |
Information retrieval › search engines
search engine switching |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationales · SIGIR 2011 |
Information retrieval
user behavior |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationales · SIGIR 2011 |
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
user study |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationales · SIGIR 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metadata sharding · 0.5erasure coding · 0.5client-side instrumentation · 0.2behavioral modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Identification of Generative Forged Western Blot ImagesabstractWith the rapid advancement of AI generative image technologies, the quality of fabricated images has significantly improved, posing a serious challenge to research integrity. Western blot (WB) images, frequently used in scientific publications, have become a primary target for forgery, leading to serious academic misconduct. However, detecting AI-generated WB images remains particularly challenging due to the low texture complexity and structural simplicity of WB images. To address this issue, we propose a novel detection framework for generative WB forgeries by leveraging large-scale pretrained models with targeted fine-tuning. This approach retains the generalization capabilities of the backbone model while adapting it to the unique characteristics of WB images. Moreover, we introduce an adversarial feature alignment module with a direction-aware domain classifier designed according to the banded and structural nature of WB images, which enhances robustness under limited data and across unseen generative styles. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method consistently achieves superior performance compared with existing approaches across multiple generative models, low-resource target domains, and cross-domain settings, showing higher detection accuracy, stronger generalization, and robustness to common post-processing operations. These results highlight the practical applicability of the proposed framework in real-world scientific integrity monitoring. Yunqiao Zhang, Shunquan Tan, Jiwu Huang |
TrustCom | 1 |
| 2025 | Universal forged image detection and localization via self-supervised data generation and large-scale model adaptation
Yang Su 0005, Shunquan Tan, Yunqiao Zhang, Jiwu Huang |
Multim. Syst. | 3 |
| 2021 | Facebook's Tectonic Filesystem: Efficiency from Exascale
Satadru Pan, Theano Stavrinos, Yunqiao Zhang, Atul Sikaria, Pavel Zakharov, Shiva Shankar P., Mike Shuey, Richard Wareing, Monika Gangapuram, Guanglei Cao, Christian Preseau, Pratap Singh, Kestutis Patiejunas, J. R. Tipton, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Wyatt Lloyd |
FAST | 3 |
| 2020 | Improved Intermediate Data Management for MapReduce FrameworksabstractMapReduce is a popular distributed framework for big data analysis. However, the current MapReduce framework is insufficiently efficient in handling intermediate data, which may cause bottlenecks in I/O operations, computation, and network bandwidth. Previous work addresses the I/O problem by aggregating map task outputs (i.e. intermediate data) for each single reduce task on one machine. Unfortunately, when there are a large number of reduce tasks, their concurrent requests for intermediate data generate a large amount of I/O operations. In this paper, we present APA (Aggregation, Partition, and Allocation), a new intermediate data management system for the MapReduce framework. APA aggregates the intermediate data from the map tasks in each rack to one file, and the file host pushes the needed intermediate data to each reduce task. Thus, it reduces the number of disk seeks involved in handling intermediate data within one job. Rather than evenly distributing the intermediate data among reduce tasks based on the keys as in current MapReduce, APA partitions the intermediate data to balance the execution latency of different reduce tasks. APA further decides where to allocate each reduce task to minimize the intermediate data transmission time between map tasks and reduce tasks. Through experiments on a real MapReduce Hadoop cluster using the HiBench benchmark suite, we show that APA improves the performance of the current Hadoop by 40%-50%. Haoyu Wang 0003, Haiying Shen, Charles Reiss, Arnim Jain, Yunqiao Zhang |
IPDPS | 5 |
| 2011 | Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationalesabstractSearch engine switching is the voluntary transition between Web search engines. Engine switching can occur for a number of reasons, including user dissatisfaction with search results, a desire for broader topic coverage or verification, user preferences, or even unintentionally. An improved understanding of switching rationales allows search providers to tailor the search experience according to the different causes. In this paper we study the reasons behind search engine switching within a session. We address the challenge of identifying switching rationales by designing and implementing client-side instrumentation to acquire in-situ feedbacks from users. Using this feedback, we investigate in detail the reasons that users switch engines within a session. We also study the relationship between implicit behavioral signals and the switching causes, and develop and evaluate models to predict the reasons for switching. In addition, we collect editorial judgments of switching rationales by third-party judges and show that we can recover switching causes a posteriori. Our findings provide valuable insights into why users switch search engines in a session and demonstrate the relationship between search behavior and switching motivations. The findings also reveal sufficient behavioral consistency to afford accurate prediction of switching rationale, which can be used to dynamically adapt the search experience and derive more accurate competitive metrics. Qi Guo 0002, Ryen W. White, Yunqiao Zhang, Blake Anderson, Susan T. Dumais |
SIGIR | 3 |