Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zemin Du
dblp:400/3122
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Video understanding and tracking · 87% Vision and language · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
streaming video understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SVBench: A Benchmark with Temporal Multi-Turn Dialogues for Streaming Video Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SVBench: A Benchmark with Temporal Multi-Turn Dialogues for Streaming Video Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SVBench: A Benchmark with Temporal Multi-Turn Dialogues for Streaming Video Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-automated annotation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SVBench: A Benchmark with Temporal Multi-Turn Dialogues for Streaming Video UnderstandingabstractDespite the significant advancements of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) on established benchmarks, there remains a notable gap in suitable evaluation regarding their applicability in the emerging domain of long-context streaming video understanding. Current benchmarks for video understanding typically emphasize isolated single-instance text inputs and fail to evaluate the capacity to sustain temporal reasoning throughout the entire duration of video streams. To address these limitations, we introduce SVBench, a pioneering benchmark with temporal multi-turn question-answering chains specifically designed to thoroughly assess the capabilities of streaming video understanding of current LVLMs. We design a semi-automated annotation pipeline to obtain 49,979 Question-Answer (QA) pairs of 1,353 streaming videos, which includes generating QA chains that represent a series of consecutive multi-turn dialogues over video segments and constructing temporal linkages between successive QA chains. Our experimental results, obtained from 14 models in dialogue and streaming evaluations, reveal that while the closed-source GPT-4o outperforms others, most open-source LVLMs struggle with long-context streaming video understanding. We also construct a StreamingChat model, which significantly outperforms open-source LVLMs on our SVBench and achieves comparable performance on diverse vision-language benchmarks. We expect SVBench to advance the research of streaming video understanding by providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of current LVLMs. Our benchmark and model can be accessed at https://yzy-bupt.github.io/SVBench. Zhenyu Yang 0009, Zemin Du, Dizhan Xue, Shengsheng Qian, Jiahong Wu 0002, Fan Yang 0094, Weiming Dong, Changsheng Xu |
ICLR | 3 |