Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chaofeng Qu
dblp:400/4224
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
confidence-based reasoning step division · 0.9best-of-n · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model ConfidenceabstractCurrent approaches for training Process Reward Models (PRMs) often involve deconposing responses into multiple reasoning steps using rule-based techniques, such as using predefined placeholder tokens or setting the reasoning step’s length to a fixed size. These approaches overlook the fact that certain words don’t usually indicate true decision points. To address this, we propose AdaptiveStep, a method that divides reasoning steps based on the model’s confidence in predicting the next word, offering more information on decision-making at each step, improving downstream tasks like reward model training. Moreover, our method requires no manual annotation. Experiments with AdaptiveStep-trained PRMs in mathematical reasoning and code generation show that the outcome PRM achieves state-of-the-art Best-of-N performance, surpassing greedy search strategy with token-level value-guided decoding, while also reducing construction costs by over 30% compared to existing open-source PRMs. We also provide a thorough analysis and case study on its performance, transferability, and generalization capabilities. We provide our code on https://github.com/Lux0926/ASPRM. Chaofeng Qu, Zhaoling Chen, Zefan Cai, Jason Klein Liu, Chonghan Liu, Yunhui Xia, Li Zhao 0007, Jiang Bian 0002, Chuheng Zhang, Wei Shen 0005, Zhouhan Lin |
ICML | 3 |