EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ozora Sako
dblp:400/5019
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 77% Autonomous driving · 12% 3D vision · 12% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cyber-physical and IoT security
autonomous vehicle security |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | On the Realism of LiDAR Spoofing Attacks against Autonomous Driving Vehicle at High Speed and Long Distance · NDSS 2025 Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability Analysis · ICRA 2025 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security › autonomous vehicle security
LiDAR spoofing |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | On the Realism of LiDAR Spoofing Attacks against Autonomous Driving Vehicle at High Speed and Long Distance · NDSS 2025 Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability Analysis · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › range-based localization
LiDAR localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability Analysis · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability Analysis · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
LiDAR |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | On the Realism of LiDAR Spoofing Attacks against Autonomous Driving Vehicle at High Speed and Long Distance · NDSS 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability Analysis · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spoofing attack · 1.7scan matching · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Slamspoof: Practical Lidar Spoofing Attacks on Localization Systems Guided by Scan Matching Vulnerability AnalysisabstractAccurate localization is essential for enabling modern full self-driving services. These services heavily rely on map-based traffic information to reduce uncertainties in recognizing lane shapes, traffic light locations, and traffic signs. Achieving this level of reliance on map information requires centimeter-level localization accuracy, which is currently only achievable with LiDAR sensors. However, LiDAR is known to be vulnerable to spoofing attacks that emit malicious lasers against LiDAR to overwrite its measurements. Once localization is compromised, the attack could lead the victim off roads or make them ignore traffic lights. Motivated by these serious safety implications, we design SLAMSpoof, the first practical LiDAR spoofing attack on localization systems for self-driving to assess the actual attack significance on autonomous vehicles. SLAMSpoof can effectively find the effective attack location based on our scan matching vulnerability score (SMVS), a point-wise metric representing the potential vulnerability to spoofing attacks. To evaluate the effectiveness of the attack, we conduct real-world experiments on ground vehicles and confirm its high capability in real-world scenarios, inducing position errors of$\geq 4.2$meters (more than typical lane width) for all 3 popular LiDAR-based localization algorithms. We finally discuss the potential countermeasures of this attack. Code is available at https://github.com/Keio-CSG/slamspoof. Rokuto Nagata, Kenji Koide, Yuki Hayakawa, Kazuma Ikeda, Ozora Sako, Qi Alfred Chen, Takami Sato, Kentaro Yoshioka |
ICRA | 6 |
| 2025 | On the Realism of LiDAR Spoofing Attacks against Autonomous Driving Vehicle at High Speed and Long Distance
Takami Sato, Yuki Hayakawa, Kazuma Ikeda, Ozora Sako, Rokuto Nagata, Ryo Yoshida, Qi Alfred Chen, Kentaro Yoshioka |
NDSS | 5 |