Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siva Kishore Gollapalli

dblp:400/6697 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.912025
SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad Performance · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
script-based reasoning
0.912025
SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad Performance · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7chain-of-thought · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad Performance
abstract
We propose Step-by-Step Coding (SBSC): a multi-turn math reasoning framework that enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate sequence of programs for solving Olympiad level math problems. After each turn/step, by leveraging the code execution outputs and programs of previous steps, the model generates the next sub-task and the corresponding program to complete it. This way, SBSC, sequentially navigates to reach the final answer. SBSC allows more granular, flexible and precise approach to problem-solving compared to existing methods. Extensive experiments highlight the effectiveness of SBSC in tackling competition and Olympiad-level math problems. For Claude-3.5-Sonnet, we observe SBSC (greedy decoding) surpasses existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) program generation based reasoning strategies by absolute 10.7% on AMC12, 8% on AIME and 12.6% on MathOdyssey. Given SBSC is multi-turn in nature, we also benchmark SBSC’s greedy decoding against self- consistency decoding results of existing SOTA math reasoning strategies and observe performance gain by absolute 6.2% on AMC, 6.7% on AIME and 7.4% on MathOdyssey.
Kunal Singh, Ankan Biswas, Sayandeep Bhowmick, Pradeep Moturi, Siva Kishore Gollapalli
ICLR5