Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sayandeep Bhowmick
dblp:400/7187
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad Performance · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
script-based reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad Performance · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7chain-of-thought · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SBSC: Step-by-Step Coding for Improving Mathematical Olympiad PerformanceabstractWe propose Step-by-Step Coding (SBSC): a multi-turn math reasoning framework that enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate sequence of programs for solving Olympiad level math problems. After each turn/step, by leveraging the code execution outputs and programs of previous steps, the model generates the next sub-task and the corresponding program to complete it. This way, SBSC, sequentially navigates to reach the final answer. SBSC allows more granular, flexible and precise approach to problem-solving compared to existing methods. Extensive experiments highlight the effectiveness of SBSC in tackling competition and Olympiad-level math problems. For Claude-3.5-Sonnet, we observe SBSC (greedy decoding) surpasses existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) program generation based reasoning strategies by absolute 10.7% on AMC12, 8% on AIME and 12.6% on MathOdyssey. Given SBSC is multi-turn in nature, we also benchmark SBSC’s greedy decoding against self- consistency decoding results of existing SOTA math reasoning strategies and observe performance gain by absolute 6.2% on AMC, 6.7% on AIME and 7.4% on MathOdyssey. Kunal Singh, Ankan Biswas, Sayandeep Bhowmick, Pradeep Moturi, Siva Kishore Gollapalli |
ICLR | 3 |