Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kanishk Bhatia
dblp:400/8354
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
differentiable simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PRDP: Progressively Refined Differentiable Physics · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unrolled differentiation · 0.9implicit differentiation · 0.9bi-level optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PRDP: Progressively Refined Differentiable PhysicsabstractThe physics solvers employed for neural network training are primarily iterative, and hence, differentiating through them introduces a severe computational burden as iterations grow large. Inspired by works in bilevel optimization, we show that full accuracy of the network is achievable through physics significantly coarser than fully converged solvers. We propose *progressively refined differentiable physics* (PRDP), an approach that identifies the level of physics refinement sufficient for full training accuracy. By beginning with coarse physics, adaptively refining it during training, and stopping refinement at the level adequate for training, it enables significant compute savings without sacrificing network accuracy. Our focus is on differentiating iterative linear solvers for sparsely discretized differential operators, which are fundamental to scientific computing. PRDP is applicable to both unrolled and implicit differentiation. We validate its performance on a variety of learning scenarios involving differentiable physics solvers such as inverse problems, autoregressive neural emulators, and correction-based neural-hybrid solvers. In the challenging example of emulating the Navier-Stokes equations, we reduce training time by 62%. Kanishk Bhatia, Felix Koehler, Nils Thürey |
ICLR | 1 |