Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert C. Macdonald
dblp:401/1274
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 75% Information theory · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum channel
classical-quantum channel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Covert Communication Over Classical-Quantum Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Information theory › information-theoretic security
covert communication |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Covert Communication Over Classical-Quantum Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum channel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Covert Communication Over Classical-Quantum Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum communication |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Covert Communication Over Classical-Quantum Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-letter expression · 0.9entangling measurement · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Covert Communication Over Classical-Quantum ChannelsabstractWe investigate covert communication over general memoryless classical-quantum channels with fixed finite-size input alphabets. We show that the square root law (SRL) governs covert communication in this setting when product a ofninput states is used:$L_{\mathrm { SRL}}\sqrt {n}+o(\sqrt {n})$covert bits (but no more) can be reliably transmitted innuses of classical-quantum channel, where$L_{\mathrm { SRL}}\gt 0$is a channel-dependent constant that we callcovert capacity. We also show that ensuring covertness requires$J_{\mathrm { SRL}}\sqrt {n}+o(\sqrt {n})$bits secret key shared by the communicating parties prior to transmission, where$J_{\mathrm { SRL}}\geq 0$is a channel-dependent constant. We assume a quantum-powerful adversary that can perform an arbitrary joint (entangling) measurement on allnchannel uses. We determine the single-letter expressions for$L_{\mathrm { SRL}}$and$J_{\mathrm { SRL}}$, and establish conditions when$J_{\mathrm { SRL}}=0$(i.e., no pre-shared secret key is needed). Finally, we evaluate scenarios where covert communication is not governed by the SRL. Michael S. Bullock, Azadeh Sheikholeslami, Mehrdad Tahmasbi, Robert C. Macdonald, Saikat Guha 0001, Boulat A. Bash |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 4 |