Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
B. Christian Schmidt
dblp:401/5598
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › open-world recognition
open-set recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics
biodiversity monitoring |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
training-time regularization · 1.7post-hoc OSR · 1.7auxiliary data training · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity MonitoringabstractGlobal biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, yet little information isknown about most species and how their populations are changing. Indeed, some90% Earth’s species are estimated to be completely unknown. Machine learning hasrecently emerged as a promising tool to facilitate long-term, large-scale biodiversitymonitoring, including algorithms for fine-grained classification of species fromimages. However, such algorithms typically are not designed to detect examplesfrom categories unseen during training – the problem of open-set recognition(OSR) – limiting their applicability for highly diverse, poorly studied taxa such asinsects. To address this gap, we introduce Open-Insect, a large-scale, fine-graineddataset to evaluate unknown species detection across different geographic regionswith varying difficulty. We benchmark 38 OSR algorithms across three categories:post-hoc, training-time regularization, and training with auxiliary data, finding thatsimple post-hoc approaches remain a strong baseline. We also demonstrate how toleverage auxiliary data to improve species discovery in regions with limited data.Our results provide timely insights to guide the development of computer visionmethods for biodiversity monitoring and species discovery. Yuyan Chen, Nico Lang, B. Christian Schmidt, Yves Basset, Sara Beery, Maxim Larrivée, David Rolnick |
NeurIPS | 3 |