Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

B. Christian Schmidt

dblp:401/5598 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.912025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › open-world recognition
open-set recognition
0.912025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Environmental and earth informatics
biodiversity monitoring
0.312025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species classification
0.312025
Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

training-time regularization · 1.7post-hoc OSR · 1.7auxiliary data training · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Open-Insect: Benchmarking Open-Set Recognition of Novel Species in Biodiversity Monitoring
abstract
Global biodiversity is declining at an unprecedented rate, yet little information isknown about most species and how their populations are changing. Indeed, some90% Earth’s species are estimated to be completely unknown. Machine learning hasrecently emerged as a promising tool to facilitate long-term, large-scale biodiversitymonitoring, including algorithms for fine-grained classification of species fromimages. However, such algorithms typically are not designed to detect examplesfrom categories unseen during training – the problem of open-set recognition(OSR) – limiting their applicability for highly diverse, poorly studied taxa such asinsects. To address this gap, we introduce Open-Insect, a large-scale, fine-graineddataset to evaluate unknown species detection across different geographic regionswith varying difficulty. We benchmark 38 OSR algorithms across three categories:post-hoc, training-time regularization, and training with auxiliary data, finding thatsimple post-hoc approaches remain a strong baseline. We also demonstrate how toleverage auxiliary data to improve species discovery in regions with limited data.Our results provide timely insights to guide the development of computer visionmethods for biodiversity monitoring and species discovery.
Yuyan Chen, Nico Lang, B. Christian Schmidt, Yves Basset, Sara Beery, Maxim Larrivée, David Rolnick
NeurIPS3