Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leo Tenenbaum
dblp:401/5836
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-5268-9910ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 77% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack › speculative execution attack
spectre defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack
speculative execution attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › speculative execution
secure speculation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automated design-time testing · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation CountermeasuresabstractIn recent years, several hardware-based countermeasures proposed to mitigate Spectre attacks have been shown to be insecure. To enable the development of effective secure speculation countermeasures, we need easy-to-use tools that can automatically test their security guarantees early-on in the design phase to facilitate rapid prototyping. Leo Tenenbaum, David Adler, Assaf Klein, Arpit Gogia, Alaa R. Alameldeen, Marco Guarnieri, Mark Silberstein, Oleksii Oleksenko, Gururaj Saileshwar |
ASPLOS (2) | 2 |