Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sara Dragutinovic

dblp:401/7499 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
Strategy Coopetition Explains the Emergence and Transience of In-Context Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
in-weights learning
0.912025
Strategy Coopetition Explains the Emergence and Transience of In-Context Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.912025
Strategy Coopetition Explains the Emergence and Transience of In-Context Learning · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mechanistic interpretability · 0.9mathematical modeling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Strategy Coopetition Explains the Emergence and Transience of In-Context Learning
abstract
In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful ability that emerges in transformer models, enabling them to learn from context without weight updates. Recent work has established emergent ICL as a transient phenomenon that can sometimes disappear after long training times. In this work, we sought a mechanistic understanding of these transient dynamics. Firstly, we find that—after the disappearance of ICL—the asymptotic strategy is a remarkable hybrid between in-weights and in-context learning, which we term “context-constrained in-weights learning” (CIWL). CIWL is in competition with ICL, and eventually replaces it as the dominant strategy of the model (thus leading to ICL transience). However, we also find that the two competing strategies actually share sub-circuits, which gives rise to cooperative dynamics as well. For example, in our setup, ICL is unable to emerge quickly on its own, and can only be enabled through the simultaneous slow development of asymptotic CIWL. CIWL thus both cooperates and competes with ICL, a phenomenon we term “strategy coopetition”. We propose a minimal mathematical model that reproduces these key dynamics and interactions. Informed by this model, we were able to identify a setup where ICL is truly emergent and persistent.
Aaditya K. Singh, Ted Moskovitz, Sara Dragutinovic, Felix Hill, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Andrew M. Saxe
ICML3