Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ibrahim Elsharkawy
dblp:401/7746
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › confidence estimation
confidence interval estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
density ratio estimation · 1.7contrastive normalizing flows · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and CompetitionabstractThe FAIR Universe – HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge focused on measuring the physical properties of elementary particles with imperfect simulators. Participants were required to compute and report confidence intervals for a parameter of interest regarding the Higgs boson while accounting for various systematic (epistemic) uncertainties. The dataset is a tabular dataset of 28 features and 280 million instances. Each instance represents a simulated proton-proton collision as observed at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland. The features of these simulations were chosen to capture key characteristics of different types of particles. These include primary attributes, such as the energy and three-dimensional momentum of the particles, as well as derived attributes, which are calculated from the primary ones using domain-specific knowledge. Additionally, a label feature designates each instance’s type of proton-proton collision, distinguishing the Higgs boson events of interest from three background sources. As outlined in this paper, the permanent dataset release allows long-term benchmarking of new techniques. The leading submissions, including Contrastive Normalising Flows and Density Ratios estimation through classification, are described. Our challenge has brought together the physics and machine learning communities to advance our understanding and methodologies in handling systematic uncertainties within AI techniques. Wahid Bhimji, Ragansu Chakkappai, Po-Wen Chang, Yuan-Tang Chou, Sascha Diefenbacher, Jordan Dudley, Ibrahim Elsharkawy, Steven Farrell, Aishik Ghosh, Cristina Giordano, Isabelle Guyon, Christopher J. Harris 0004, Yota Hashizume, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Elham E Khoda, Claudius Krause, Benjamin Nachman, David Rousseau, Robert Schöfbeck, Maryam Shooshtari, Dennis Schwarz, Daohan Wang |
NeurIPS | 7 |