Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinyeong Kim
dblp:401/7801
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Vision and language · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 10% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › language model interpretability
attention head analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
vision transformer explainability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
visual attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Grounding · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-to-image attention · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9residual replacement · 0.9attention redistribution · 0.9attention map · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual GroundingabstractVisual grounding seeks to localize the image region corresponding to a free-form text description. Recently, the strong multimodal capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have driven substantial improvements in visual grounding, though they inevitably require fine-tuning and additional model components to explicitly generate bounding boxes or segmentation masks. However, we discover that a few attention heads in frozen LVLMs demonstrate strong visual grounding capabilities. We refer to these heads, which consistently capture object locations related to text semantics, as localization heads. Using localization heads, we introduce a straightforward and effective training-free visual grounding framework that utilizes text-to-image attention maps from localization heads to identify the target objects. Surprisingly, only three out of thousands of attention heads are sufficient to achieve competitive localization performance compared to existing LVLM-based visual grounding methods that require fine-tuning. Our findings suggest that LVLMs can innately ground objects based on a deep comprehension of the text-image relationship, as they implicitly focus on relevant image regions to generate informative text outputs. Seil Kang, Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Seong Jae Hwang |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | See What You Are Told: Visual Attention Sink in Large Multimodal ModelsabstractLarge multimodal models (LMMs) "see" images by leveraging the attention mechanism between text and visual tokens in the transformer decoder. Ideally, these models should focus on key visual information relevant to the text token. However, recent findings indicate that LMMs have an extraordinary tendency to consistently allocate high attention weights to specific visual tokens, even when these tokens are irrelevant to the corresponding text. In this study, we investigate the property behind the appearance of these irrelevant visual tokens and examine their characteristics. Our findings show that this behavior arises due to the massive activation of certain hidden state dimensions, which resembles the attention sink found in language models. Hence, we refer to this phenomenon as the visual attention sink. In particular, our analysis reveals that removing the irrelevant visual sink tokens does not impact model performance, despite receiving high attention weights. Consequently, we recycle the attention to these tokens as surplus resources, redistributing the attention budget to enhance focus on the image. To achieve this, we introduce Visual Attention Redistribution (VAR), a method that redistributes attention in image-centric heads, which we identify as innately focusing on visual information. VAR can be seamlessly applied across different LMMs to improve performance on a wide range of tasks, including general vision-language tasks, visual hallucination tasks, and vision-centric tasks, all without the need for additional training, models, or inference steps. Experimental results demonstrate that VAR enables LMMs to process visual information more effectively by adjusting their internal attention mechanisms, offering a new direction to enhancing the multimodal capabilities of LMMs. Seil Kang, Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Seong Jae Hwang |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Mono-Modalizing Extremely Heterogeneous Multi-modal Medical Image Registration
Kyobin Choo, Hyunkyung Han, Jinyeong Kim, Chanyong Yoon, Seong Jae Hwang |
MICCAI (5) | 3 |
| 2025 | Pathology-Aware Adaptive Watermarking for Text-Driven Medical Image Synthesis
Chanyoung Kim 0001, Dayun Ju, Jinyeong Kim, Woojung Han, Roberto Alcover-Couso, Seong Jae Hwang |
MICCAI (16) | 3 |
| 2025 | Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelabstractHow do vision transformers (ViTs) represent and process the world? This paper addresses this long-standing question through the first systematic analysis of 6.6K features across all layers, extracted via sparse autoencoders, and by introducing the residual replacement model, which replaces ViT computations with interpretable features in the residual stream. Our analysis reveals not only a feature evolution from low-level patterns to high-level semantics, but also how ViTs encode curves and spatial positions through specialized feature types. The residual replacement model scalably produces a faithful yet parsimonious circuit for human-scale interpretability by significantly simplifying the original computations. As a result, this framework enables intuitive understanding of ViT mechanisms. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our framework in debiasing spurious correlations. Jinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim 0002, Yumin Shim, Joohyeok Kim, Sunyoung Jung, Seong Jae Hwang |
NeurIPS | 1 |