Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Feiyang Hao
dblp:401/7847
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition
optical character recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9embedding alignment · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language ModelabstractChinese calligraphy, a UNESCO Heritage, remains computationally challenging due to visual ambiguity and cultural complexity. Existing AI systems fail to contextualize their intricate scripts, because of limited annotated data and poor visual-semantic alignment. We propose CalliReader, a vision-language model (VLM) that solves the Chinese Calligraphy Contextualization (CC$^2$) problem through three innovations: (1) character-wise slicing for precise character extraction and sorting, (2) CalliAlign for visual-text token compression and alignment, (3) embedding instruction tuning (e-IT) for improving alignment and addressing data scarcity. We also build CalliBench, the first benchmark for full-page calligraphic contextualization, addressing three critical issues in previous OCR and VQA approaches: fragmented context, shallow reasoning, and hallucination. Extensive experiments including user studies have been conducted to verify our CalliReader's \textbf{superiority to other state-of-the-art methods and even human professionals in page-level calligraphy recognition and interpretation}, achieving higher accuracy while reducing hallucination. Comparisons with reasoning models highlight the importance of accurate recognition as a prerequisite for reliable comprehension. Quantitative analyses validate CalliReader's efficiency; evaluations on document and real-world benchmarks confirm its robust generalization ability. Chenyi Huang, Feiyang Hao, Zhouhui Lian |
ICCV | 4 |