Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Feiyang Hao

dblp:401/7847 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding
0.912025
CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition
optical character recognition
0.912025
CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9embedding alignment · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CalliReader: Contextualizing Chinese Calligraphy via an Embedding-Aligned Vision-Language Model
abstract
Chinese calligraphy, a UNESCO Heritage, remains computationally challenging due to visual ambiguity and cultural complexity. Existing AI systems fail to contextualize their intricate scripts, because of limited annotated data and poor visual-semantic alignment. We propose CalliReader, a vision-language model (VLM) that solves the Chinese Calligraphy Contextualization (CC$^2$) problem through three innovations: (1) character-wise slicing for precise character extraction and sorting, (2) CalliAlign for visual-text token compression and alignment, (3) embedding instruction tuning (e-IT) for improving alignment and addressing data scarcity. We also build CalliBench, the first benchmark for full-page calligraphic contextualization, addressing three critical issues in previous OCR and VQA approaches: fragmented context, shallow reasoning, and hallucination. Extensive experiments including user studies have been conducted to verify our CalliReader's \textbf{superiority to other state-of-the-art methods and even human professionals in page-level calligraphy recognition and interpretation}, achieving higher accuracy while reducing hallucination. Comparisons with reasoning models highlight the importance of accurate recognition as a prerequisite for reliable comprehension. Quantitative analyses validate CalliReader's efficiency; evaluations on document and real-world benchmarks confirm its robust generalization ability.
Chenyi Huang, Feiyang Hao, Zhouhui Lian
ICCV4