EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ankur Singha
dblp:401/8753
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
multilevel monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › statistical physics
statistical physics simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.7renormalization group · 1.7heat bath algorithm · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical PhenomenaabstractInvestigating critical phenomena or phase transitions is of high interest in physics and chemistry, for which Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, a crucial tool for numerically analyzing macroscopic properties of given systems, are often hindered by an emerging divergence of correlation length---known as scale invariance at criticality (SIC) in the renormalization group theory. SIC causes the system to behave the same at any length scale, from which many existing sampling methods suffer: long-range correlations cause critical slowing down in Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), and require intractably large receptive fields for generative samplers. In this paper, we propose a Renormalization-informed Generative Critical Sampler (RiGCS)---a novel sampler specialized for near-critical systems, where SIC is leveraged as an advantage rather than a nuisance. Specifically, RiGCS builds on MultiLevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) with Heat Bath (HB) algorithms, which perform ancestral sampling from low-resolution to high-resolution lattice configurations with site wise-independent conditional HB sampling. Although MLMC-HB is highly efficient under exact SIC, it suffers from a low acceptance rate under slight SIC violation. Notably, SIC violation always occurs in finite-size systems, and may induce long-range and higher-order interactions in the renormalized distributions, which are not considered by independent HB samplers. RiGCS enhances MLMC-HB by replacing a part of the conditional HB sampler with generative models that capture those residual interactions and improve the sampling efficiency. Our experiments show that the effective sample size of RiGCS is a few orders of magnitude higher than state-of-the-art generative model baselines in sampling configurations for $128 \times 128$ two-dimensional Ising systems. SIC also allows us to adopt a specialized sequential training protocol with model transfer, which significantly accelerates training. Ankur Singha, Elia Cellini, Kim Nicoli, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Shinichi Nakajima |
ICLR | 1 |