Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zitong Shi
dblp:401/9273
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 55% Graph learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
2.7 | 3 | 2026 | Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and Defense · AAAI 2026 Multi-order Orchestrated Curriculum Distillation for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Graph Learning · NeurIPS 2025 EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated graph learning |
2.6 | 3 | 2025 | Multi-order Orchestrated Curriculum Distillation for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Graph Learning · NeurIPS 2025 EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 Energy-based Backdoor Defense Against Federated Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
1.4 | 3 | 2026 | EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and Defense · AAAI 2026 Multi-order Orchestrated Curriculum Distillation for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Graph Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and Defense · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
backdoor defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Energy-based Backdoor Defense Against Federated Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph compression
graph sparsification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-order Orchestrated Curriculum Distillation for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Graph Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
parameter sparsification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified Sparsification · ICML 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Energy-based Backdoor Defense Against Federated Graph Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
graph adversarial attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and Defense · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topological perturbation · 2.0robustness-aware aggregation · 2.0adversarial training · 2.0topological graph energy · 1.7energy-based model · 1.7clustering · 1.7sparsification · 0.9knowledge sharing · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and DefenseabstractText-Attributed Graphs (TAGs) are graphs where both nodes and edges are associated with text attributes. To leverage their semantic richness, recent efforts have integrated large language models (LLMs) with graph neural networks, leading to the development of GraphLLMs. However, many real-world datasets remain inaccessible, and processing text-attributed graphs while ensuring privacy and efficiency remains a challenge. To address this, we place TAGs within a federated environment, referred to as TAG-FGL. Despite its potential, TAG-FGL remains largely underexplored in the face of adversarial threats. In this work, we introduce GTAE, a novel attack framework that cascades influence-guided topological perturbations and embedding-level text refinements to generate transferable, modality-agnostic adversarial inputs. To defend against these threats, we propose STRUM, a defense strategy that combines local adversarial training with robustness-aware aggregation, enhancing resilience at both the node and system levels. Extensive experiments on five real-world datasets with diverse model backbones demonstrate that GTAE significantly degrades model performance, while STRUM consistently improves robustness. Zitong Shi, Guancheng Wan, Wenke Huang 0003, Mang Ye |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Energy-based Backdoor Defense Against Federated Graph LearningabstractFederated Graph Learning is rapidly evolving as a privacy-preserving collaborative approach. However, backdoor attacks are increasingly undermining federated systems by injecting carefully designed triggers that lead to the model making incorrect predictions. Trigger structures and injection locations in Federated Graph Learning are more diverse, making traditional federated defense methods less effective. In our work, we propose an effective Federated Graph Backdoor Defense using Topological Graph Energy (FedTGE). At the local client level, it injects distribution knowledge into the local model, assigning low energy to benign samples and high energy to the constructed malicious substitutes, and selects benign clients through clustering. At the global server level, the energy elements uploaded by each client are treated as new nodes to construct a global energy graph for energy propagation, making the selected clients' energy elements more similar and further adjusting the aggregation weights. Our method can handle high data heterogeneity, does not require a validation dataset, and is effective under both small and large malicious proportions. Extensive results on various settings of federated graph scenarios under backdoor attacks validate the effectiveness of this approach. Guancheng Wan, Zitong Shi, Wenke Huang 0003, Guibin Zhang, Dacheng Tao, Mang Ye |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | EAGLES: Towards Effective, Efficient, and Economical Federated Graph Learning via Unified SparsificationabstractFederated Graph Learning (FGL) has gained significant attention as a privacy-preserving approach to collaborative learning, but the computational demands increase substantially as datasets grow and Graph Neural Network (GNN) layers deepen. To address these challenges, we propose $\textbf{EAGLES}$, a unified sparsification framework. EAGLES applies client-consensus parameter sparsification to generate multiple unbiased subnetworks at varying sparsity levels, reducing the need for iterative adjustments and mitigating performance degradation. In the graph structure domain, we introduced a dual-expert approach: a $\textit{graph sparsification expert}$ uses multi-criteria node-level sparsification, and a $\textit{graph synergy expert}$ integrates contextual node information to produce optimal sparse subgraphs. Furthermore, the framework introduces a novel distance metric that leverages node contextual information to measure structural similarity among clients, fostering effective knowledge sharing. We also introduce the $\textbf{Harmony Sparsification Principle}$, EAGLES balances model performance with lightweight graph and model structures. Extensive experiments demonstrate its superiority, achieving competitive performance on various datasets, such as reducing training FLOPS by 82\% $\downarrow$ and communication costs by 80\% $\downarrow$ on the ogbn-proteins dataset, while maintaining high performance. Zitong Shi, Guancheng Wan, Wenke Huang 0003, Guibin Zhang, He Li 0054, Carl Yang 0001, Mang Ye |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Don't Forget the Enjoin: FocalLoRA for Instruction Hierarchical Alignment in Large Language ModelsabstractRecent studies reveal that large language models (LLMs) often struggle to resolve conflicting instructions embedded within hierarchical prompts, resulting in decreased compliance with system-level directives and compromising the reliability of safety-critical applications. While earlier approaches attempt to improve instruction hierarchy awareness through prompt engineering or embedding-level modifications, they typically lack structural modeling and either offer limited gains or require extensive fine-tuning. In this work, we introduce $\textbf{FocalLoRA}$, a parameter-efficient and structure-aware framework that strengthens hierarchical instruction adherence by selectively optimizing structurally critical attention heads, referred to as $\textit{focal heads}$, which exhibit heightened sensitivity to instruction conflicts. Experiments across multiple models and a dedicated benchmark demonstrate that FocalLoRA markedly enhances system instruction compliance with minimal tuning cost. For instance, on Llama-8B, fine-tuning only 0.0188\% of parameters yields a 35.52\% $\uparrow$ in system instruction compliance. Zitong Shi, Frank Wan, Haixin Wang 0003, Ruoyan Li, Zijie Huang 0002, Wanjia Zhao, Yijia Xiao, Xiao Luo 0001, Carl Yang 0001, Yizhou Sun, Wei Wang 0010 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-order Orchestrated Curriculum Distillation for Model-Heterogeneous Federated Graph LearningabstractFederated Graph Learning (FGL) has been shown to be particularly effective in enabling collaborative training of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in decentralized settings. Model-heterogeneous FGL further enhances practical applicability by accommodating client preferences for diverse model architectures. However, existing model-heterogeneous approaches primarily target Euclidean data and fail to account for a crucial aspect of graph-structured data: topological relationships. To address this limitation, we propose **TRUST**, a novel knowledge distillation-based **model-heterogeneous FGL** framework. Specifically, we propose Progressive Curriculum Node Scheduler to progressively introduce challenging nodes based on learning difficulty. In Adaptive Curriculum Distillation Modulator, we propose an adaptive temperature modulator that dynamically adjusts knowledge distillation temperature to accommodate varying client capabilities and graph complexity. Moreover, we leverage Wasserstein‑Driven Affinity Distillation to enable models to capture cross-class structural relationships through optimal transport. Extensive experiments on multiple graph benchmarks and model-heterogeneous settings show that **TRUST** outperforms existing methods, achieving an average 3.6\% $\uparrow$ performance gain, particularly under moderate heterogeneity conditions. The code is available for anonymous access at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TRUST-NeurIPS2025. Frank Wan, Run Liu, Wenke Huang 0003, Zitong Shi, Pinyi Jin, Guibin Zhang, Bo Du 0001, Mang Ye |
NeurIPS | 5 |