Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaoyue Ling
dblp:401/9539
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video coding · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding › video compression
learned video compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SMC++: Masked Learning of Unsupervised Video Semantic Compression · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Image and video coding › coding for machines
semantic video compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SMC++: Masked Learning of Unsupervised Video Semantic Compression · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Image and video coding
video compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SMC++: Masked Learning of Unsupervised Video Semantic Compression · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preference · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked video modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | SMC++: Masked Learning of Unsupervised Video Semantic Compression · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 2.0masked video modeling · 2.0masked motion prediction · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SMC++: Masked Learning of Unsupervised Video Semantic CompressionabstractMost video compression methods focus on human visual perception, neglecting semantic preservation. This leads to severe semantic loss during the compression, hampering downstream video analysis tasks. In this paper, we propose a Masked Video Modeling (MVM)-powered compression framework that particularly preserves video semantics, by jointly mining and compressing the semantics in a self-supervised manner. While MVM is proficient at learning generalizable semantics through the masked patch prediction task, it may also encode non-semantic information like trivial textural details, wasting bitcost and bringing semantic noises. To suppress this, we explicitly regularize the non-semantic entropy of the compressed video in the MVM token space. The proposed framework is instantiated as a simple Semantic-Mining-then-Compression (SMC) model. Furthermore, we extend SMC as an advanced SMC++ model from several aspects. First, we equip it with a masked motion prediction objective, leading to better temporal semantic learning ability. Second, we introduce a Transformer-based compression module, to improve the semantic compression efficacy. Considering that directly mining the complex redundancy among heterogeneous features in different coding stages is non-trivial, we introduce a compact blueprint semantic representation to align these features into a similar form, fully unleashing the power of the Transformer-based compression module. Extensive results demonstrate the proposed SMC and SMC++ models show remarkable superiority over previous traditional, learnable, and perceptual quality-oriented video codecs, on three video analysis tasks and seven datasets. Yuan Tian 0017, Xiaoyue Ling, Cong Geng, Qiang Hu 0003, Guo Lu, Guangtao Zhai |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2025 | Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine PreferenceabstractImage Quality Assessment (IQA) based on human subjective preferences has undergone extensive research in the past decades. However, with the development of communication protocols, the visual data consumption volume of machines has gradually surpassed that of humans. For machines, the preference depends on downstream tasks such as segmentation and detection, rather than visual appeal. Considering the huge gap between human and machine visual systems, this paper proposes the topic: Image Quality Assessment for Machine Vision for the first time. Specifically, we (1) defined the subjective preferences of machines, including downstream tasks, test models, and evaluation metrics; (2) established the Machine Preference Database (MPD), which contains 2.25M fine-grained annotations and 30k reference/distorted image pair instances; (3) verified the performance of mainstream IQA algorithms on MPD. Experiments show that current IQA metrics are human-centric and cannot accurately characterize machine preferences. We sincerely hope that MPD can promote the evolution of IQA from human to machine preferences. Project page is on: https://github.com/lcysyzxdxc/MPD. Chunyi Li 0001, Yuan Tian 0017, Xiaoyue Ling, Haodong Duan, Haoning Wu 0001, Ziheng Jia, Xiaohong Liu 0001, Xiongkuo Min, Guo Lu, Weisi Lin, Guangtao Zhai |
CVPR | 3 |