Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chenghui Lv
dblp:402/0847
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Forensics-Bench: A Comprehensive Forgery Detection Benchmark Suite for Large Vision Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
forgery detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Forensics-Bench: A Comprehensive Forgery Detection Benchmark Suite for Large Vision Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal evaluation benchmark · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Forensics-Bench: A Comprehensive Forgery Detection Benchmark Suite for Large Vision Language ModelsabstractRecently, the rapid development of AIGC has significantly boosted the diversities of fake media spread in the Internet, posing unprecedented threats to social security, politics, law, and etc. To detect the ever-increasingly diverse malicious fake media in the new era of AIGC, recent studies have proposed to exploit Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) to design robust forgery detectors due to their impressive performance on a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, it still lacks a comprehensive benchmark designed to comprehensively assess LVLMs' discerning capabilities on forgery media. To fill this gap, we present Forensics-Bench, a new forgery detection evaluation benchmark suite to assess LVLMs across massive forgery detection tasks, requiring comprehensive recognition, location and reasoning capabilities on diverse forgeries. Forensics-Bench comprises 63, 292 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions, covering 112 unique forgery detection types from 5 perspectives: forgery semantics, forgery modalities, forgery tasks, forgery types and forgery models. We conduct thorough evaluations on 22 open-sourced LVLMs and 3 proprietary models GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, highlighting the significant challenges of comprehensive forgery detection posed by Forensics-Bench. We anticipate that Forensics-Bench will motivate the community to advance the frontier of LVLMs, striving for all-around forgery detectors in the era of AIGC. The deliverables will be updated here. Jin Wang 0039, Chenghui Lv, Shichao Dong 0001, Kelu Yao, Chao Li 0028, Wenqi Shao |
CVPR | 2 |