Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jishnu Sethumadhavan Nair

dblp:402/1744 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
reasoning benchmark
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
reasoning model
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-time scaling · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DNR Bench: Benchmarking Over-Reasoning in Reasoning LLMs
abstract
Test-time scaling has significantly improved large language model (LLM) performance, enabling deeper reasoning to solve complex problems. However, this increased reasoning capability also leads to excessive token generation and unnecessary problem-solving attempts. We introduce "Don't Reason Bench (DNR Bench)", a new benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ ability to robustly understand tricky reasoning triggers and avoid unnecessary generation. DNR Bench consists of 150 adversarially designed prompts that are easy for humans to understand and respond to, but surprisingly not for many recent prominent LLMs. DNR Bench tests models' abilities across different capabilities, such as instruction adherence, hallucination avoidance, redundancy filtering, and unanswerable question recognition. We evaluate reasoning LLMs (RLMs), including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI O3-mini, and Claude-3.7-sonnet, and compare them against a powerful non-reasoning model, such as GPT-4o. Our experiments reveal that RLMs generate up to 70x more tokens than necessary, often failing at tasks that simpler non-reasoning models handle efficiently with higher accuracy. Our findings underscore the need for more effective training and inference strategies in RLMs.
Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Masoud Hashemi, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Jishnu Sethumadhavan Nair, Aman Tiwari, Vikas Yadav
AAAI4