Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Melissa Z. Pan

dblp:402/2332 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 56% Multi-agent systems · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
LLM-as-a-judge
0.912025
Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? · NeurIPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
LLM-based multi-agent systems
0.912025
Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? · NeurIPS 2025
Query processing and optimization › semantic query processing
semantic query optimization
0.912025
Semantic Operators and Their Optimization: Towards AI-Based Data Analytics with Accuracy Guarantees · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical accuracy guarantees · 1.7large language model · 1.7trace annotation · 0.9LLM-as-a-judge · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?
abstract
Despite enthusiasm for Multi-Agent LLM Systems (MAS), their performance gains on popular benchmarks are often minimal. This gap highlights a critical need for a principled understanding of why MAS fail. Addressing this question requires systematic identification and analysis of failure patterns. We introduce MAST-Data, a comprehensive dataset of 1600+ annotated traces collected across 7 popular MAS frameworks. MAST-Data is the first multi-agent system dataset to outline the failure dynamics in MAS for guiding the development of better future systems. To enable systematic classification of failures for MAST-Data, we build the first Multi-Agent System Failure Taxonomy (MAST). We develop MAST through rigorous analysis of 150 traces, guided closely by expert human annotators andvalidated by high inter-annotator agreement (κ = 0.88). This process identifies 14 unique modes, clustered into 3 categories: (i) system design issues, (ii) inter-agent misalignment, and (iii) task verification. To enable scalable annotation, we develop an LLM-as-a-Judge pipeline with high agreement with human annotations. We leverage MAST and MAST-Data to analyze failure patterns across models (GPT4, Claude 3, Qwen2.5, CodeLlama) and tasks (coding, math, general agent), demonstrating improvement headrooms from better MAS design. Our analysis provides insights revealing that identified failures require more sophisticated solutions, highlighting a clear roadmap for future research. We publicly release our comprehensive dataset (MAST-Data), the MAST, and our LLM annotator to facilitate widespread research and development in MAS.
Mert Cemri, Melissa Z. Pan, Lakshya A. Agrawal, Bhavya Chopra, Rishabh Tiwari, Kurt Keutzer, Aditya G. Parameswaran, Daniel Klein 0001, Kannan Ramchandran, Matei Zaharia, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Ion Stoica
NeurIPS2
2025 Semantic Operators and Their Optimization: Towards AI-Based Data Analytics with Accuracy Guarantees
abstract
The semantic capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have the potential to enable rich analytics and reasoning over vast knowledge corpora. Unfortunately, existing systems either empirically optimize expensive LLM-powered operations with no performance guarantees , or limit their support to simple batched-inference primitives. We introduce semantic operators , the first formalism with statistical accuracy guarantees for general-purpose AI-based operations with natural language parameters (e.g., filtering, sorting, joining or aggregating records using natural language criteria). Each operator can be implemented by multiple AI algorithms , which compose individual model invocations to orchestrate the model over the data. Our programming model specifies the expected behavior of each operator with a high-quality reference algorithm , and we develop an optimization framework that reduces cost, while providing accuracy guarantees for individual operators. Using this approach, we propose several novel optimizations to accelerate semantic filtering, joining, group-by and top-k operations by up to 1, 000×. We implement semantic operators in the LOTUS system and demonstrate LOTUS' effectiveness on real, bulk-semantic processing applications, including fact-checking, biomedical multi-label classification, search, and topic analysis. We show that the semantic operator model is expressive, capturing state-of-the-art AI pipelines in a few operator calls, and making it easy to express new pipelines that match or exceed quality of recent LLM-based analytic systems by up to 170%, while offering accuracy guarantees. Overall, LOTUS programs match or exceed the accuracy of state-of-the-art AI pipelines for each task while running up to 3.6× faster than the highest-quality baselines. LOTUS is publicly available at https://github.com/lotus-data/lotus.
Liana Patel, Siddharth Jha, Melissa Z. Pan, Parth Asawa, Carlos Guestrin, Matei Zaharia
Proc. VLDB Endow.3