Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mari Ashiga

dblp:402/2358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Program synthesis and code generation · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
compiler optimization
0.912025
Tuning LLM-based Code Optimization via Meta-Prompting: An Industrial Perspective · ASE 2025
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
LLM-based code optimization
0.912025
Tuning LLM-based Code Optimization via Meta-Prompting: An Industrial Perspective · ASE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-prompting · 0.9large language model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Tuning LLM-based Code Optimization via Meta-Prompting: An Industrial Perspective
abstract
There is a growing interest in leveraging multiple large language models (LLMs) for automated code optimization. However, industrial platforms deploying multiple LLMs face a critical challenge: prompts optimized for one LLM often fail with others, requiring expensive model-specific prompt engineering. This cross-model prompt engineering bottleneck severely limits the practical deployment of multi-LLM systems in production environments. We introduce Meta-Prompted Code Optimization (Mpco), a framework that automatically generates high-quality, task-specific prompts across diverse LLMs while maintaining industrial efficiency requirements. Mpco leverages meta-prompting to dynamically synthesize context-aware optimization prompts by integrating project metadata, task requirements, and LLM-specific contexts. It is an essential part of the ARTEMIS code optimization platform for automated validation and scaling.Our comprehensive evaluation on five real-world codebases with 366 hours of runtime benchmarking demonstrates Mpco’s effectiveness: it achieves overall performance improvements up to 19.06% with the best statistical rank across all systems compared to baseline methods. Analysis shows that 96% of the top-performing optimizations stem from meaningful edits. Through systematic ablation studies and meta-prompter sensitivity analysis, we identify that comprehensive context integration is essential for effective meta-prompting and that major LLMs can serve effectively as meta-prompters, providing actionable insights for industrial practitioners.
Jingzhi Gong, Rafail Giavrimis, Paul Brookes, Vardan Voskanyan 0001, Fan Wu 0009, Mari Ashiga, Matthew Truscott, Michail Basios, Leslie Kanthan, Jie Xu 0007, Zheng Wang 0001
ASE6